Chinese infantry fighting vehicles

by78

General
I don't think I've seen these particular hearing protection/ear cans before.

53271126027_a78312b49f_k.jpg

53271126017_4bf2f54314_k.jpg
53272014911_7172331423_k.jpg
 

Hicks

Just Hatched
Registered Member
Anyone knows correct dimensions of ZBD-04 and ZBD-04A IFVs? The first one is most likely 7520x3300x2530 (to top of turret) mm, but I'm not sure if it is correct or refers to earlier ZBD-97 variant. Maybe any blueprints appeared on the web? Also it is interesting to know ground pressure based on track length/width and fuel tank capacity...
 

The Observer

Junior Member
Registered Member
More details of the interior of the Mengshi-III field ambulance.

53280250076_fd6655b65d_k.jpg
So they're using double doors for rear access? I wonder if flip down ramp would be better, especially when trying to carry casualties on stretchers into the vehicle.
 

Heliox

Junior Member
Registered Member
So they're using double doors for rear access? I wonder if flip down ramp would be better, especially when trying to carry casualties on stretchers into the vehicle.

That'd be a solution looking for a problem.

Loading stretchers is actually best done at waist-shoulder height, while full standing. Handling a stretcher load lower than waist level and/or bent over is back breaking

Adding a ramp doesn't really make it better here. Vehicle ramps are actually slippery things. Not the best underfoot conditions when trying to load a stretcher. I've seen sim casualty dropped off shoulder height trying to load onto a 8x8 ambo (with ramp), no fun. It also doesn't help that in ramped ambulances, the stretcher has to be brought into the vehicle and then side-on lifted into the rack rather than end-on from behind the vehicle - which means the bearers have to do some heavy lifting inside the cabin while bent over.

Rather than adding a ramp to a vehicle that doesn't have one built-in, better to spend the money on putting in a self-loading stretcher rack - like so ...

 
Top