It's impossible that it has 4000 miles range, that defies the laws of physics.
Last edited:
It's impossible that it has 4000 miles range, that defies the laws of physics.
"China did something that we couldn't do?"It's impossible that it has 4000 miles range, that defies the laws of physics.
I think they are racists who were caught unaware and they are now scaremongering to make up for their internal contradiction between China is a superpower, and China cannot innovateDo we see China bragging about this hypersonic test? No. So if people are saying what's being reported as unbelievable and goes against the laws of physics, that's coming from their end. So either their side is lying or it's the truth because it happened.
No, a boost glider going hypersonic for that long would break up, no matter what. Their is an operational limit on the range of HGVs because current materials engineering cannot deal with the immense forces put on the glider."China did something that we couldn't do?"
"Impossible! China only steals and copies, it cannot innovate. It must have found a way to break laws of physics. Totally normal thing to happen"
Two different testsI've seen some articles said failed some said success. Which one is correct?
No, a boost glider going hypersonic for that long would break up, no matter what. Their is an operational limit on the range of HGVs because current materials engineering cannot deal with the immense forces put on the glider.
Two different tests
That bolded sentence is the most telling one.Speaking to the military newspaper Stars and Stripes in Germany this week, Admiral Charles Richard, the head of Strategic Command who oversees US nuclear forces, said China could “now execute any possible nuclear employment strategy”.
“We should be open to the reality that China is also capable of technological innovation,” Lewis said.
ICBM vs FOBS vs HGV thread.
None of the weapons are good for surprise attacks against the US, which has exceptional detection capabilities.