No garbage from SCMP
Chinese Hypersonic Developments (HGVs/HCMs)
- Thread starter A.Man
- Start date
SCMP's credibility is always questionable .. but this time they Quoted some source from mainland.
very interesting article.
With no link to the sources.
I have found the particular paper Stephen Chen is referring to.
I might be missing something, but I didn't see anything in this paper mentioning about establishing a near-space command.
The word "command" in the abstract is the literal meaning of "command, control and communication" not the meaning of command like STRATCOM or PACOM.
I might be missing something, but I didn't see anything in this paper mentioning about establishing a near-space command.
The word "command" in the abstract is the literal meaning of "command, control and communication" not the meaning of command like STRATCOM or PACOM.
escobar
Brigadier
Nice find. Stephen always in excess. Do you have the whole paper?
China is testing something really exotic tonight as it has FIVE drop zones like it did with FOBS test in 2021. So perhaps it will be the 2nd FOBS test. The drop zones don't even align together - two to the south are quite consistent with CZ-2C, and three to the west do not fit together.
I find it fascinating people state China is opaque in its tech development when there are so many journal published papers. To be sure, these are not the government programs of record and "only" R&D. However, they do tell us quite a bit about the state of the public art in China and it is quite advanced.
Back to the papers:
Experimental study on the ignition in a scramjet with a self-designed water plasma ignitor
Numerical study on the kerosene deflection characteristics and regulation methods of supersonic combustor equipped with a 75° swept strut
Numerical and experimental investigation of streamwise-vortex/fuel-plume interactions in a scramjet combustor
Three-dimensional numerical study on reducing hypersonic blunt body drag and aeroheating with spike-aerodisk-bleed air channel
This is on the edge for hypersonic, but...
Copula-based Bayesian uncertainty quantification framework of SST turbulence model for flow over a Gaussian bump
Back to the papers:
Experimental study on the ignition in a scramjet with a self-designed water plasma ignitor
Numerical study on the kerosene deflection characteristics and regulation methods of supersonic combustor equipped with a 75° swept strut
Numerical and experimental investigation of streamwise-vortex/fuel-plume interactions in a scramjet combustor
Three-dimensional numerical study on reducing hypersonic blunt body drag and aeroheating with spike-aerodisk-bleed air channel
This is on the edge for hypersonic, but...
Copula-based Bayesian uncertainty quantification framework of SST turbulence model for flow over a Gaussian bump
Don't confuse fundamental research with applied research.
AssassinsMace
Lieutenant General
That's because it's as simple as Chinese research is done in Chinese that Americans can't read... literally. Why? Because they don't trust any Chinese to translate for them and because American students don't find Chinese romantic enough for them to choose what language they want to learn. I remember reading an article of an American who knew how to speak and read Chinese and he decided to see if it was true that China doesn't publish the very thing you're talking about. He went to China himself and he found many of the things the US accuses China of being secretive in public records. So it basically comes down to what they think what China hides is just simply because they can't read Chinese. Their intelligence services have the same problem. They don't trust any Chinese to translate for them hence why they lack intelligence on China. They don't want to learn Chinese so ironically they want the Chinese to volunteer it and translate to English for them.