Chinese Geopolitics

Status
Not open for further replies.

Blackstone

Brigadier
Once again, Shinzo Abe administration talks out both sides of its mouth. Just a few days ago, Japanese officials called for all nations to take steps to reduce tensions in ESC and SCS territorial disputes, and then we see Japan doing the opposite. Now we see if the US will castigate Japan for taking unilateral actions that increase tensions.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


TOKYO (AP) — Japan on Friday gave names to five uninhabited islets in an island group at the center of a territorial dispute with China as part of efforts to reinforce its claim, sparking quick condemnation from Beijing.

The five islands, named after directions of the compass, are part of the group in the East China Sea known as Senkaku in Japanese and Diaoyu in Chinese. Five bigger islands in the group already have names. Chinese and Japanese coast guard ships have regularly confronted each other in surrounding waters.

The five were among 158 islands that were named Friday, with the list published on a website of the Japanese maritime policy department. The other islands are in non-disputed Japanese waters.

The government said that naming the islands was meant to raise public awareness that they belong to Japan.

"It's not just about the Senkaku issue. We are conducting a broader review of all remote islands," Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshihide Suga told reporters. "China has its own approach, and Japan has our own fundamental position on the Senkaku islands. We only respond appropriately."

China immediately rejected the Japanese move, with Foreign Ministry spokesman Qin Gang calling it "illegal and invalid."

"China resolutely opposes Japan's actions harming China's territory and sovereignty. No unilateral action undertaken by Japan can change the fact that Diaoyu and its surrounding islands belong to China," Qin said.

Assigning names to disputed islands does not change their legal status. Japan insists the islands lie within its territorial waters; China says they were stolen by Japan in 1895 and should have been returned at the end of World War II.

Taiwan, which calls them Diaoyutai, also claims the islands but has worked out an arrangement with Japan guaranteeing its fishermen access to the area, and it rejects any notion of joining with Beijing on the matter.

China and Japan also are at odds over exploitation of East China Sea gas deposits in the area.

The disputed waters are surrounded by rich fishing grounds. Chinese coast guard and fishing boats have recently approached the area more frequently, sometimes violating Japanese waters, particularly since Japan's previous government nationalized the main Senkaku islands in 2012.

Ties between Japan and China have worsened in recent years over the island dispute, a contested gas field in the East China Sea and lingering animosity over Japan's World War II-era actions in China.
 

GreatWall

New Member
Registered Member
Once again, Shinzo Abe administration talks out both sides of its mouth. Just a few days ago, Japanese officials called for all nations to take steps to reduce tensions in ESC and SCS territorial disputes, and then we see Japan doing the opposite. Now we see if the US will castigate Japan for taking unilateral actions that increase tensions.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


I was just waiting for the Japanese to come out and do something like this after the recent Chinese military exercises this past week. They're trying to stay relevant with these mind games, a back and forth if you will. It's blatantly obvious what they were doing when they out of nowhere decided to name all these islands and just so happened to throw the disputed islands in their as well.

At the very least I think they achieved what they set out to do. Tell the world that "Hey! These are our islands, we have names for them", and to annoy the Chinese.
 

Janiz

Senior Member
It's blatantly obvious what they were doing when they out of nowhere decided to name all these islands and just so happened to throw the disputed islands in their as well.
Well, that's a work of few months to gather documents and come up with names so that's not 'out of nowhere' move but planned and announced earlier with a certain deadline for government workers...
 

delft

Brigadier
In a surprising turn of events, Chinese and Japanese views of each other have improved. Just two months ago, only around 6% of Chinese and 5% of Japanese had positive views of the other, and the latest survey shows about 8% of Chinese and 7% of Japanese hold positive feelings of the other. At this rate, the two nations would become friends in about two hundred years, which is faster than I would have guessed by a factor of ten.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!




140725_bremmer_pew1.jpg
I would like a margin giving say 95% reliability. Might that be 2% on the views of Chinese for Japan or Japanese for China then the changes are not significant.
 

A.Man

Major
US woos Africa as rivals eye economic growth

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Nairobi (AFP) - African leaders head to Washington for a landmark US summit this week, with President Barack Obama hoping to boost trade, development and security ties amid growing competition from China on the continent.

China overtook the United States as Africa's largest trading partner five years ago, with Beijing's trade now worth more than $200 billion (150 billion euros) a year, double that of Washington.

But while the US is playing catch-up, experts say it is wrong to view the situation as a direct competition between the two powers, since China's investments potentially boost US trade and their companies are focused on different sectors.

"The Obama administration has come under increasing pressure from the commercial sector to prioritise Africa policy. This US-Africa summit is more a response to this than a direct beauty contest with China," said Alex Vines, from Britain's Chatham House think tank.

The International Monetary Fund says Africa is now growing faster than Asia.

"Africa now is a land of competition of Europe, America, China, and even some Arabian countries," Rene Kouassi, director of economic affairs at the African Union, told AFP.

The US has been keen to avoid any suggestion that the three-day summit opening Monday -- dubbed the "largest single engagement" by any American president with Africa -- is designed to challenge the role of other nations in the continent.

"We welcome the attention Africa is receiving from other countries like China, Brazil, India and Turkey," said Will Stevens, spokesman for the US State Department's Bureau of African Affairs.


Although 50 heads of state were due to take part in the summit, several, including Sierra Leone President Ernest Bai Koroma and Liberia President Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, have already said they are not planning to go because of the ongoing Ebola epidemic in their countries.

The US, the world's largest economy, is only Africa's third-largest trade partner after the European Union -- some of whose members have post-colonial ties with African nations -- and China, which is hungry for the continent's natural resources.

"We believe the more the merrier. But we also think that African countries should make sure that their relationships benefit their people –- and that they add value, not extract it," Stevens added.

Redefining relationships with the continent will be key, analysts say.

Africa is home to seven of the world's fastest-growing economies. Many hope to alter an image of a war-ravaged continent where foreign relationships are based on aid alone.

"The focus is no longer on aid, on humanitarian assistance... it's long overdue, that we move this relationship to the economic sphere, where it can be almost a partnership," Kenyan Foreign Minister Amina Mohamed told AFP.

James Shikwati, director of Kenya-based economic think tank the Inter Region Economic Network, argues Washington is trying to "reframe" engagement with Africa given the "new competitor China" which has been "very visible" with large-scale infrastructure projects.

"China's massive infrastructure projects kind of dwarf the American effort," said Christopher Wood, from the South African Institute of International Affairs.

"I think we are seeing increasingly an effort by the US to try and get back into that game, for example, attempts to develop energy capacity on the continent."

While past US engagement has focused on "talking about democracy and human rights," Shikwati said he expected Washington would now "temper that with some solid projects that a camera can capture... like some big dam that supplies power."

- 'The African pie' -

Others argue it is wrong to exaggerate economic competition between Washington and Beijing.

"This oft-repeated and inaccurate platitude misrepresents both current geopolitical realities and commercial opportunities," said Dane Erickson, from the University of Colorado, writing in The American Interest magazine.

The two nations often focus on different economic sectors, and it is in fact EU nations that offer the larger challenge.

"A more sober analysis of two areas of focus for the US-Africa Leaders Summit -- trade and investment, and security -- shows just how much how US, Chinese, and African interests align in key policy areas," Erickson added.

Indeed, he argues China's role may actually boost trade for the US.

"Chinese infrastructure investments -- on a continent in dire need of more roads, bridges, and ports to support growing economies and populations -- can benefit Africans, Americans, and other foreign investors," Erickson added.

"It is becoming increasingly difficult for an international executive to do business in Africa today without driving on a Chinese-constructed road, meeting in a Chinese-built conference centre, or shipping materials on a Chinese-made railway."

For Africa, competition on the continent in the "quest to grab the African pie" offers opportunities as well as risks, argues Shikwati.

"Competition gives African countries the leverage to negotiate and get what they want," Shikwati said, while also recalling the warnings from history that foreigners can end up "cutting the pie for themselves."
 

Blackstone

Brigadier
Philippines court just sentenced 12 Chinese fishermen to 6-10 years in prison for "illegally fishing," and the captain got 12 years. In addition, they'll be prosecuted for additional "crimes." Things are going over the cliff in a hurry, and there's no chance the Chinese public would stand for anything less than a very strong response from the ruling elites. I understand President Aquino's 'standing up to China' rationale, but if he honestly believe America would send her sons and daughters to die for Philippines over a few rocks nine thousand miles away, he's out of his mind. Boy! Talk about bluffing with a weak hand, with your opponent knowing you have nothing but hot air.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


In a move likely to further increase tensions between Beijing and Manila, a Philippine court has sentenced 12 Chinese fisherman to prison for illegal fishing. The crew members, who were arrested at Tubbataha Reef, were sentenced to between six and ten years in prison, with the boat captain receiving the maximum sentence of 12 years. All 12 men still face trial on a separate charge, possession of protected species — specifically, the pangolin, an endangered mammal hunted both as a luxury food and for use in medicine.

These fisherman were detained within waters universally recognized to belong to the Philippines, the Sulu Sea, located to the east of Palawan Island. Their boat reportedly ran aground on Tubbataha Reef, which is listed as a UNESCO World Heritage Site. The fishermen claimed that they had merely taken refuge there to avoid a storm, Voice of America reports. They pleaded not guilty to all charges.

This particular case may be most important as a precedent for another, more sensitive trial. Back in May, the Philippines arrested 11 Chinese fishermen on similar charges of illegal fishing and poaching of endangered species (two of the fishermen were underage and were later released, leaving nine in custody). Unlike the dozen men who were just sentenced, those fisherman were arrested in disputed waters near the Spratly Islands, roughly 100 kilometers (62 miles) west of Palawan. Manila claimed the fisherman had encroached on its 200-mile EEZ, while Beijing claimed they were fishing within Chinese waters and demanded their immediate release. In an interview with the South China Morning Post, the fishermen likewise said that they had been illegally detained within Chinese waters. The men told SCMP they did not recognize the legality of the case against them.

By comparison, the Chinese fisherman just sentenced, who were arrested in non-disputed waters, provoked a far milder response. In response to that case, the Chinese Foreign Ministry said in a statement that China “attaches great importance to the security of its fishermen abroad, while educating and supervising them on their fishing activities.” Should the trial of the nine fishermen arrested near the Spratlys come to a similar conclusion, expect Beijing to be far more vocal in its response.

The pre-trial of the nine fisherman arrested near the Spratlys has been postponed at least four times since May, a possible indication that Manila is cautious about moving forward with such an incendiary case. Given the high level of tensions between China and the Philippines at the moment, movement on the trial of Chinese fishermen captured in a disputed region would cause a major outpouring on anger from China — especially as the case this week proves Philippine courts are inclined to throw the book at illegal fishing activities.

An earlier incident involving Japan might give the Philippines an idea of what to expect should the trial move forward. In 2010, Japanese authorities attempted to try a Chinese fishing boat captain for ramming Japanese coast guard vessels near the disputed Senkaku/Diaoyu Islands. Official and popular outrage from China (including massive anti-Japan protests and a decision to halt rare earth exports to Japan) forced Tokyo to release the captain instead. The 2010 incident marked the beginning of a particularly rocky period in China-Japan relations.
 

Blackstone

Brigadier
This explains why the US isn't putting a travel ban in place with regards to the Ebola outbreak.

Nope, the article explains why the US continues to maintain its focus on Africa. Believing America would hedge against China by exposing ger citizens to ebola is wrongheaded.
 

Equation

Lieutenant General
LOL...maybe there is a city named Hong Kong as well in Brazil. Heck we have a Paris, Texas and it's not to be mistaken with Paris, France.:p;)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top