Chinese Engine Development

broadsword

Brigadier
I think you got a translation problem, it didn't say the ws-15 would finish flight testing in 2014, it said the "验证机“ of the ws-15 would finish its test. "验证机“(I don't know the english word for it), is not even a prototype, before you build a prototype, you build a "验证机“ to test the basic design concept.


I'm not as technically inclined as you guys are, so forgive me if I'm wrong, but the European Commission defines a demonstrator as more advanced than a prototype,

"A prototype is intended as a man-made object which shows the scientific and technical feasibility of a concept. A demonstrator goes beyond the prototype because is intended to show the full feasibility of the concept at the real scale of commercialization. "

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

LesAdieux

Junior Member
I'm not as technically inclined as you guys are, so forgive me if I'm wrong, but the European Commission defines a demonstrator as more advanced than a prototype,

"A prototype is intended as a man-made object which shows the scientific and technical feasibility of a concept. A demonstrator goes beyond the prototype because is intended to show the full feasibility of the concept at the real scale of commercialization. "

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


I think in China and inUS as well, the order is demonstrator, prototype, production.
 

Totoro

Major
VIP Professional
as far as i can tell, western engine development usually several years for a demonstrator programme, then it goes into prototype phase, 1-2 before engine bench test, then some 3 more years before first flight test, then another 2.5 to 3 years before operational capability.

Realistically, ws15 sounds like it's some 7-8 years away from operational capability. But j20 was always suspected to be using older engines for its first two or three batches.
 

broadsword

Brigadier
I think in China and inUS as well, the order is demonstrator, prototype, production.

I think 验证机 in Chinese-speak means "experimental" rather than "demonstrator".

Case in point, the translation of a page on the X-47
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

from
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.

Also, a translated page on J-20
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

from
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


The X-47 can't be at the demonstrator stage, right?
 

latenlazy

Brigadier
as far as i can tell, western engine development usually several years for a demonstrator programme, then it goes into prototype phase, 1-2 before engine bench test, then some 3 more years before first flight test, then another 2.5 to 3 years before operational capability.

Realistically, ws15 sounds like it's some 7-8 years away from operational capability. But j20 was always suspected to be using older engines for its first two or three batches.
Except as I recall the taihang didn't exactly follow that schedule.
 

Totoro

Major
VIP Professional
True. Taihang programme started in 1986 with preliminary work and had a demonstrator of technologies fired up in 1992, followed by development hell and prototypes since then until 1999. Design was changing and sometime during that period the product we now know as ws10a appeared and was ready for testing. It first flew on a su27 in 2002. and was fully tested and certified for production by end of 2005. Sadly, as we know, production issues on serially produced engines prevented operational capability within plaaf for several more years.

What I suggusted for ws15 is a bit more optimistic than ws10 development, it's more a standard for western engine development. Who knows how well ws15 development is going or will go...
 

latenlazy

Brigadier
True. Taihang programme started in 1986 with preliminary work and had a demonstrator of technologies fired up in 1992, followed by development hell and prototypes since then until 1999. Design was changing and sometime during that period the product we now know as ws10a appeared and was ready for testing. It first flew on a su27 in 2002. and was fully tested and certified for production by end of 2005. Sadly, as we know, production issues on serially produced engines prevented operational capability within plaaf for several more years.

What I suggusted for ws15 is a bit more optimistic than ws10 development, it's more a standard for western engine development. Who knows how well ws15 development is going or will go...

Honestly though, I still suspect a compressed timeline for the WS-15.
 

Blackstone

Brigadier
True. Taihang programme started in 1986 with preliminary work and had a demonstrator of technologies fired up in 1992, followed by development hell and prototypes since then until 1999. Design was changing and sometime during that period the product we now know as ws10a appeared and was ready for testing. It first flew on a su27 in 2002. and was fully tested and certified for production by end of 2005. Sadly, as we know, production issues on serially produced engines prevented operational capability within plaaf for several more years.

What I suggusted for ws15 is a bit more optimistic than ws10 development, it's more a standard for western engine development. Who knows how well ws15 development is going or will go...

Unless and until China's jet engine industry truly absorb lessons learned from the WS-10x projects, then we'll see feature creep, design delays, cost overruns, manufacturing problems, and quality non-assurance.
 

Skywatcher

Captain
Unless and until China's jet engine industry truly absorb lessons learned from the WS-10x projects, then we'll see feature creep, design delays, cost overruns, manufacturing problems, and quality non-assurance.

It'll probably be a wash. The WS-10 took about twenty plus years or so to enter service, so the WS-15 should enter service around 2019 (unlike the WS-10, the WS-15 design goals have apparently stayed the same so far as we can tell), since IIRC, the project started in the 1997-1999 timeframe.
 

latenlazy

Brigadier
Unless and until China's jet engine industry truly absorb lessons learned from the WS-10x projects, then we'll see feature creep, design delays, cost overruns, manufacturing problems, and quality non-assurance.
The PLA generally doesn't seem to have the same problems with feature creep that western militaries do. I suspect the two major problems with the Taihang program was that they were building their expertise of jet engines concurrently with the program and they were reverse engineering a design as opposed to building a design from scratch (it's harder to troubleshoot a design that you didn't conceive yourself). Either way, it's as unlikely that they would absorb no lessons through their process with the Taihang as it is that they will have no hiccups along the way.
 
Top