Chinese Engine Development

minusone said:

@by78

I have laid out all the points in there, and all you did was again asking dumb question thinking it was smart.

Click to expand...

No, you've made a word salad out terms, acronyms, and jargons that you clearly don't understand.

minusone said:

@by78

Im asking you again, how did a simple ECU glitch that require major components upgrade to solve is not considered as an engine issue?

Click to expand...

Seriously, do you know what ECU stands for? Tell me what you think it is. Come on, it shouldn't be that hard to answer such a basic question, genius.

by78 said:

No, you've made a word salad out terms, acronyms, and jargons that you clearly don't understand.


Seriously, do you know what ECU stands for? Tell me what you think it is. Come on, it shouldn't be that hard to answer such a basic question, genius.

Click to expand...

Stop diverting and answer the simple questions.

1) Is ECU part of turbofan?
2) How come it requires other parts to resolve a suppose setting glitch when everything else is perfect?

minusone said:

Stop diverting and answer the simply question.

1) Is ECU part of turbofan?
2) How come it requires other parts to resolve a suppose setting glitch when everyhing else is perfect?

Click to expand...

Oh, this is pure comedic GOLD. This post of yours should be pinned for posterity.

If you didn't know what ECU is, why did you pretend that you did?

by78 said:

Oh, this is pure comedic GOLD. This post of yours should be pinned for posterity.

If you didn't know what ECU is, why did you pretend that you did?

Click to expand...

Stop diverting and answer the simple questions.

1) Is ECU part of turbofan?
2) How come it requires other parts to resolve a suppose setting glitch when everything else is perfect?
3) With all your geniuses flowing from the back (hoping it also flow to the head somehow), why did you refused to answer such simple questions?

minusone said:

Stop diverting and answer the simple questions.

1) Is ECU part of turbofan?
2) How come it requires other parts to resolve a suppose setting glitch when everything else is perfect?
3) With all your geniuses flowing from the back (hoping it also flow to the head somehow), why did you refused to answer such simple questions?

Click to expand...

1) Wait, don't tell me... Could it be that you think ECU is a physical component of the F135 turbofan? What in the world made you think that? Wow, this is pure comedic gold!

2) Huh? What setting glitch are you talking about? Where in the article does it mention a "setting glitch"? Are you making stuff up again? Didn't I warn you about lying before?

by78 said:

1) Wait, don't tell me... Could it be? You think ECU is a physical component of the F-135 turbofan? Comedic gold!
2) What setting glitch are you talking about? What's going on in your little head? It must never be boring up there.

Click to expand...

1) Im not even going to respond, as you clearly have no clues about anything. Good job exposing yourself to be a clown.

2)How the heck did you under-spec a turbofan if it's not due to capping the engine from performing to its full potential?

And how the heck is that possibly not due to ECU setting glitch (as the fellow in charge admitted to be done unknowingly) given that every components are perfect as you claim the F135 to be? Or is it not?

Assuming you are right about the engine being perfect, how come such simple programming fix requires engine components upgrade to FIX??

And how the heck is this not a sign of an unreliable engine that led to sorting rate lower than 60% of the entire F35 fleet?

Has your own logic failed you right there?

minusone said:

1) Im not even going to respond, as you clearly have no clues about anything. Good job exposing yourself to be a clown.

Click to expand...

Just admit that you didn't and still don't know what ECU is. It's clear that you think ECU is a physical component of the F135 turbofan, which is simple incredible. I mean this pure comedic gold, only made possible by a genius IQ of Minusone.

minusone said:

2)How the heck did you under-spec a turbofan if it's not due to capping the engine from performing to its full potential?

Click to expand...

I can't read the article for you or understand it for you, but here are the relevant parts. Read them at least three five times, and if you still don't understand it, then you should really blame your parents and mother nature.

"The original program engine specification allocated 15 kW [kilowatts] of bleed air extraction to support system cooling requirements, and the F135 engine was designed, tested, and qualified to this specification with a level of margin available for future growth," Schmidt wrote. "During the final stages of initial aircraft development, air vehicle cooling requirements grew to exceed planned bleed air extraction."

"To provide the necessary bleed air, the engine is required to run hotter, and the program is realizing the effects of this through an increase in operating temperature, and a decrease in engine life, which is driving earlier depot inductions and an increase in lifecycle cost," the written testimony adds.

minusone said:

And how the heck is that possibly not due to ECU setting glitch (as the fellow in charge admitted to be done unknowingly) given that every components are perfect as you claim the F135 to be? Or is it not?

Click to expand...

What glitch are you talking about? Show me the part of the article where this glitch is mentioned.

More importantly, how can ECU have a glitch? It's like saying the budget request for a future bridge has been infected by a computer virus. It's completely nonsensical.

You clearly don't know what ECU is, and it's fine by me if you continue to make an utter fool of yourself by pretending that you do.

minusone said:

1) Im not even going to respond, as you clearly have no clues about anything. Good job exposing yourself to be a clown.

2)How the heck did you under-spec a turbofan if it's not due to capping the engine from performing to its full potential?

And how the heck is that possibly not due to ECU setting glitch (as the fellow in charge admitted to be done unknowingly) given that every components are perfect as you claim the F135 to be? Or is it not?

Assuming you are right about the engine being perfect, how come such simple programming fix requires engine components upgrade to FIX??

And how the heck is this not a sign of an unreliable engine that led to sorting rate lower than 60% of the entire F35 fleet?

Has your own logic failed you right there?

Click to expand...

Ok, let's make this as simple as possible for you.

What does the acronym ECU stand for?

Hint: it doesn't stand for Electronic Control Unit or Electrical Control Unit or Engine Control Unit. ECU isn't a physical thing, and it contains no computer programming.

This is intended for everyone here, but please stop using acronyms. If you're going to take so much time to write such long posts and arguments, you might as well spell things out so that 3rd party laymen can begin to get a grasp of the specifics. The only reason some people use acronyms is for branding/marketing of laws/programs/departments in politics/bureaucracy, to conceal their own ignorance in a technical subject matter, or to save time when 99% of their day-to-day involves interactions almost exclusively with people who are all on the same page. The former-most and latter-most are clearly not the case here...