Chinese Engine Development

paintgun

Senior Member
oh cmon you two are sweating over this, let's just keep to each other's opinion shall we? I dont see how you guys are going to reconcile each other's position after 2 days of back and forth arguments on something as elusive as China's engine development.

for me, J-10B with AL-31 paints not so rosy view of the WS-10.
 

Quickie

Colonel
In case some of you may be wondering, this is the video I'm talking about. Again this is in no way conclusive on the engines' spooling speed but in light of scarce info we had, videos are one of the main sources of info we have to fall back on. J-20 at 7:00. J-10B at 10:00.


[video=youtube;Wxtm2wVwLnA]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wxtm2wVwLnA[/video]
 

pissybits

Junior Member
Be careful of who you are calling a fan boy. I'm just going by the actual facts of the WS-10 are in use in large numbers. Apparently some doubters just don't want to admit it.

If you're going by the so called actual news information from doubters than the same can be said about on the Chinese side point of view. Trying to be objective on a bias point of view becomes subjective when the author has no insight to the nature of that "issue" in the first place.

labeling everyone as either a doubter or fanboy is not productive. i know there is a lot of misleading nonsense and political propaganda on both sides, but i reckon the assumptions reached through consensus on this forum is some of the most reliable info on the pla in the public sphere. we're only able to do this if we take everything with a grain of salt and analyze the quality and consistency of what we hear.

the dumbest thing to do is to get too emotional because: 1. it just aint worth it, and 2. we stop using our faculties of reason.

lets stay focused on why one case is more plausible than the other rather than who's a fanboy/doubter. these slogans made up simply so we can dismiss each others' opinions instead of engaging in dialogue. i know some people actually fit these labels, i prefer to call them idiots because that's really what they are.
 

pissybits

Junior Member
Going by assumptions from people who don't want to see China's engine progressing doesn't make their arguments and view points as the holy grail to judge on the WS-10. You can have a million haters nit picking on whatever info they had on China's engine and they can make up a plethora of excuses for it. Like they say, if you can repeat a lie long enough people will believe it. Just look at how many negatives we get about China's progress on it's engine by the media and the many so called "experts" out there. They can easily warped the readers into believing it as well.

watever man, haven't u realized by now that both drumming up and playing down china as a threat has a political audience in america? that's why so many facts about china in the mainstream western media is totally whack. china used to fib about the west in the same way but (most) people stopped believing.

in the end u gotta remember these misrepresentative reports r made only to get people to support either the author's own political motives or those of his financiers.

a few writers downplaying china's aircraft engine progress doesn't hurt china, only the people who are misled by them; so just relax my friend and watch the theatrics.

ps. lol i hope popeye doesn't delete this post, i'm not trying to start a politics flame war, just trying to bring some clarity!
 
Last edited:

montyp165

Senior Member
China isn't equipping their planes with the WS-10A because they have no other options. They're equipping their planes with the WS-10A because it's a viable engine that they intend to be their mainstay. If what tphuang says is right it enforces my presumption that they're working out the kinks through mass adoption and regular use, something all products go through eventually.

This is also my POV on the WS-10 development, particularly if this is the first mass-production high-performance turbofan in domestic production used by the PLA, simultaneously working out kinks in design and manufacturing is no small feat (even for the Euros or the Japanese for that matter), but is absolutely necessary to build the required experience and expertise for future engine development. The AL-31 has the advantage of being revised over a longer time, while the WS-10 has had less time to do so (even if the design may be superior), so adding more resources may be necessary to speed up rate of refinement.
 

Equation

Lieutenant General
watever man, haven't u realized by now that both drumming up and playing down china as a threat has a political audience in america? that's why so many facts about china in the mainstream western media is totally whack. china used to fib about the west in the same way but (most) people stopped believing.

in the end u gotta remember these misrepresentative reports r made only to get people to support either the author's own political motives or those of his financiers.

a few writers downplaying china's aircraft engine progress doesn't hurt china, only the people who are misled by them; so just relax my friend and watch the theatrics.

ps. lol i hope popeye doesn't delete this post, i'm not trying to start a politics flame war, just trying to bring some clarity!


I understand but, where are the reports for the doubters when the F-35 were having engine trouble? You don't see me go trashing or question the US capability, but when it comes to China, there seems to be a plethora of writers from the West ready to pounce on them on every chance they get. That's what I'm trying to get at.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Last edited:

latenlazy

Brigadier
I understand but, where are the reports for the doubters when the F-35 were having engine trouble? You don't see me go trashing or question the US capability, but when it comes to China, there seems to be a plethora of writers from the West ready to pounce on them on every chance they get. That's what I'm trying to get at.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
You're looking for moral equivalence, not fact. Besides there's enough griping over the F-35 in non Chinese forums.
 

pissybits

Junior Member
I understand but, where are the reports for the doubters when the F-35 were having engine trouble? You don't see me go trashing or question the US capability, but when it comes to China, there seems to be a plethora of writers from the West ready to pounce on them on every chance they get. That's what I'm trying to get at.

that's cuz no one doubts that the americans already have the best gear, nobody has anything to gain politically by downplaying their abilities even when they stumble a little.

china is widely posited as the biggest threat to american hegemony in the western media but at the same time is also very unknown and opaque to many outsiders. the media (and politicians) likes to tell people what they want to hear, that we're still number 1; at the same time they want to drum up the china threat occasionally to keep people on their toes and to rally support for costly geopolitical maneuvering/defense contracts.

alright enough of a detour from the topic at hand, haha back to engines.

i personally think that domestic chinese turbofans must be quite close to being satisfactory just because of how many aircraft that depend on advanced engines to achieve their operative potential have been showcased in the past three years: j-20, j-31, y-20.

i don't think the plaaf would out them publically like this if they didn't have the means to make them competent up its sleeve.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

kwaigonegin

Colonel
that's cuz no one doubts that the americans already have the best gear, nobody has anything to gain politically by downplaying their abilities even when they stumble a little.

china is widely posited as the biggest threat to american hegemony in the western media but at the same time is also very unknown and opaque to many outsiders. the media (and politicians) likes to tell people what they want to hear, that we're still number 1; at the same time they want to drum up the china threat occasionally to keep people on their toes and to rally support for costly geopolitical maneuvering/defense contracts.

alright enough of a detour from the topic at hand, haha back to engines.

i personally think that domestic chinese turbofans must be quite close to being satisfactory just because of how many aircraft that depend on advanced engines to achieve their operative potential have been showcased in the past three years: j-20, j-31, y-20.

i don't think the plaaf would out them publically like this if they didn't have the means to make them competent up its sleeve.

Hey! for a newbie you're pretty smart :D LOL I concur with your thoughts.... Welcome to the board.
 
Top