the ws-10A is not a copy of the al-31. it is based on a western engine, possibley taken from the f-16 pakistan loaned china.
a very good loan indeed.
the ws-10A is not a copy of the al-31. it is based on a western engine, possibley taken from the f-16 pakistan loaned china.
Be careful of who you are calling a fan boy. I'm just going by the actual facts of the WS-10 are in use in large numbers. Apparently some doubters just don't want to admit it.
If you're going by the so called actual news information from doubters than the same can be said about on the Chinese side point of view. Trying to be objective on a bias point of view becomes subjective when the author has no insight to the nature of that "issue" in the first place.
Going by assumptions from people who don't want to see China's engine progressing doesn't make their arguments and view points as the holy grail to judge on the WS-10. You can have a million haters nit picking on whatever info they had on China's engine and they can make up a plethora of excuses for it. Like they say, if you can repeat a lie long enough people will believe it. Just look at how many negatives we get about China's progress on it's engine by the media and the many so called "experts" out there. They can easily warped the readers into believing it as well.
China isn't equipping their planes with the WS-10A because they have no other options. They're equipping their planes with the WS-10A because it's a viable engine that they intend to be their mainstay. If what tphuang says is right it enforces my presumption that they're working out the kinks through mass adoption and regular use, something all products go through eventually.
watever man, haven't u realized by now that both drumming up and playing down china as a threat has a political audience in america? that's why so many facts about china in the mainstream western media is totally whack. china used to fib about the west in the same way but (most) people stopped believing.
in the end u gotta remember these misrepresentative reports r made only to get people to support either the author's own political motives or those of his financiers.
a few writers downplaying china's aircraft engine progress doesn't hurt china, only the people who are misled by them; so just relax my friend and watch the theatrics.
ps. lol i hope popeye doesn't delete this post, i'm not trying to start a politics flame war, just trying to bring some clarity!
You're looking for moral equivalence, not fact. Besides there's enough griping over the F-35 in non Chinese forums.I understand but, where are the reports for the doubters when the F-35 were having engine trouble? You don't see me go trashing or question the US capability, but when it comes to China, there seems to be a plethora of writers from the West ready to pounce on them on every chance they get. That's what I'm trying to get at.
I understand but, where are the reports for the doubters when the F-35 were having engine trouble? You don't see me go trashing or question the US capability, but when it comes to China, there seems to be a plethora of writers from the West ready to pounce on them on every chance they get. That's what I'm trying to get at.
that's cuz no one doubts that the americans already have the best gear, nobody has anything to gain politically by downplaying their abilities even when they stumble a little.
china is widely posited as the biggest threat to american hegemony in the western media but at the same time is also very unknown and opaque to many outsiders. the media (and politicians) likes to tell people what they want to hear, that we're still number 1; at the same time they want to drum up the china threat occasionally to keep people on their toes and to rally support for costly geopolitical maneuvering/defense contracts.
alright enough of a detour from the topic at hand, haha back to engines.
i personally think that domestic chinese turbofans must be quite close to being satisfactory just because of how many aircraft that depend on advanced engines to achieve their operative potential have been showcased in the past three years: j-20, j-31, y-20.
i don't think the plaaf would out them publically like this if they didn't have the means to make them competent up its sleeve.