I think it is safe to say no one know any Austrian, Dutch , or Spanish consumer brand : P.
And as a matter of fact there is no known Chinese brand in Europe, but a lot of Japanese . Korean.
The Japanese has similar level of hierarchy like the eastern Europeans, to compensate that the Jap companies try to implement "kaizen" culture, moving down the decision making / organisation improvement job to the lowest possible level.
It works with individual companies, but on a whole economy level it is insufficient, and lead to a national catastrophe - see Japan.
Example in a French plant there is higher autonomy of workers compared to a Polish plant, with more responsibility delegated down and less hierarchy.
But these are the individual companies, the economy level differences showing magnitude bigger gap.
In reality , if a company having a bottom up culture, with weak/ non existing hierarchy then the performance will be twice as high as the rigid one.
The rigid has a pre-defined lead time, the reactions of it is well defined for given conditions, so it is very good for military, firefighting and so on.
But it require a big overhead, and the efficiency of it ( parts or interactions per person per hour) will be inferior compared to a low rigidity structure.
And as a matter of fact there is no known Chinese brand in Europe, but a lot of Japanese . Korean.
The Japanese has similar level of hierarchy like the eastern Europeans, to compensate that the Jap companies try to implement "kaizen" culture, moving down the decision making / organisation improvement job to the lowest possible level.
It works with individual companies, but on a whole economy level it is insufficient, and lead to a national catastrophe - see Japan.
Example in a French plant there is higher autonomy of workers compared to a Polish plant, with more responsibility delegated down and less hierarchy.
But these are the individual companies, the economy level differences showing magnitude bigger gap.
In reality , if a company having a bottom up culture, with weak/ non existing hierarchy then the performance will be twice as high as the rigid one.
The rigid has a pre-defined lead time, the reactions of it is well defined for given conditions, so it is very good for military, firefighting and so on.
But it require a big overhead, and the efficiency of it ( parts or interactions per person per hour) will be inferior compared to a low rigidity structure.