An estimate can be obtained via median income x population vs stated total GDP to see what portion is invisible to the average Joe.China's economy definitely is over 2x bigger than India's but being bigger than Japan, Germany and France combined isn't that surprising considering India has more people than the entire OECD.
$42,220 for the US at 333.29 million people is $14 trillion. This vs the stated $27.7 trillion nominal GDP.
The median income in China is around 116,274 RMB per household (avg size of 3). So for 1417.57 million people and a PPP factor of 3.64, that is $15.1 trillion. This is vs $17.8 trillion nominal and supposedly $41 trillion by PPP.
India's "deprived" class is roughly half of the country's population so the break-off point can roughly approximate the median income. It is 150,000 rupees per household (avg size of 4.8), 1457.95 million total population, PPP factor of 20.2 for a resulting $2.3 trillion. This vs $3.6 trillion nominal and $21.9 trillion by PPP.
Japan is at 3.6 million yen for 125.12 million people with PPP factor of 94.68 resulting in $4.8 trillion. Again, $4.3 trillion nominal and $6.2 trillion by PPP.
Germany has a median of 51,876 euros for 84.29 million people and PPP factor of 0.7 resulting in $6.2 trillion vs $4.5 trillion nominal and $5.9 trillion by PPP.
You can see, India (like the US) has the majority of it's "GDP" captured by the upper section of society. And given producer power comes from mass affluence, not elite affluence, I would say India isn't anywhere close to Europe or Japan. This is before accounting for any possibility of cooking the books.
Last edited: