From Dave Fishman. And I've seen this too. Electricity cost for Chinese residents is as low as 0.3 RMB per kWh. I think renewables is even cheaper.
From Dave Fishman. And I've seen this too. Electricity cost for Chinese residents is as low as 0.3 RMB per kWh. I think renewables is even cheaper.
From Dave Fishman. And I've seen this too. Electricity cost for Chinese residents is as low as 0.3 RMB per kWh. I think renewables is even cheaper.
However I'm much more worried about thisWith Trump tariffs on their way, things are going to be tough for Chinese exports. The RMB lost a lot of value against the USD after the election results were announced.
In rupee terms though...One day before election 1 CNY = 0.141 USD
Today 1 CNY = 0.140 USD
Difference of 0.001 USD
October exports up 12.7%, more than doubling expectations. Imports fell 2.3%, slightly more than expected. Surplus grew to $95 billion.
Demand is likely to remain elevated for the rest of the year, ahead of Trump returning to office.
hardly any difference in exchange rates. please check before comment
Stock market in-fact rising after election results announced.
and we all know that, what was the result of first trade war.. we are actually waiting for Tariffs 2.0
The central government has ample capacity to take on additional debt - funding the pension plan is a good example of such policy. Or increasing investments in healthcare. Better yet, buy discounted apartments off of developers for subsidized housing (turn it around and IPO it into the markets or put it into the pension plan for good income generation). Separate the good LGFV assets from the bad, and take out the bad ones from local governments so the local governments can ensure the remaining LGFVs are viable entities.
Total A-share purchase by "National Team" (predominantly Central Huijin Investment, China Securities Finance Corp, and SAFE investment vehicle), had hit RMB3.2trn (US$440bn) by 2Q2024, according to Securities Times.
I certainly was not referring to you as the 'idiots' in my original post - as you clearly did not argue against the notion that stimulus was necessary. In this sense I certainly believe the term 'idiot' was appropriate given the deeply unserious and clearly mistaken understanding of the underlying situation and the subsequent policy announcements this week (PBoC Monetary Policy and the subsequent Politburo readout). In Chinese, this is what we refer to as 啪啪打脸.