Chinese Economics Thread

Randomuser

Senior Member
Registered Member
I really learnt to dislike Evergrande for what they have done. Apart from blowing up the real estate and stock market with their stupidity, they also have ruined Chinese football. They spent so much time buying overpriced mercs that the youth system sucks now and China will somehow lose out to Thailand qualifying for the world cup.

The founder should be publically executed for this. What a coincidence he's from Henan which is known for scammers. And they wonder why people are predjudiced against them.
 

TK3600

Major
Registered Member
I really learnt to dislike Evergrande for what they have done. Apart from blowing up the real estate and stock market with their stupidity, they also have ruined Chinese football. They spent so much time buying overpriced mercs that the youth system sucks now and China will somehow lose out to Thailand qualifying for the world cup.

The founder should be publically executed for this. What a coincidence he's from Henan which is known for scammers. And they wonder why people are predjudiced against them.
All Chinese football team and its associated people needs laogai, not even related to Evergrande.

Zheng He wasted a lot of money giving out gold and silk for free, at least you can say he earned face.

Football team waste a lot of money to embarass the country once a year.
 

jli88

Junior Member
Registered Member
I mean, it is not weird that India is 40% of Chinese size in GDP PPP

India has same or more population than China, all that population working produces economic output.

Anyway even the GDP PPP does not measure the real size of a economy, GDP was created to track the change in one economy from one year to the next. It can be used to compare economies that are very similar in their structure like lets say Belarus and Russia, or Netherlands and Germany.

You cant use GDP to compare Russia and Germany though, or China and US.

Communist and post communist countries have artificially low GDP due to having free services. Something free does not add nothing to the GDP but obviously contributes to the real economy.

For example in Germany you have to pay medical insurance every month (when you work is paid by the employee but it is still a economic exchange reflected in the GDP, then you go to doctor and the doctor send a bill to the insurance, other economical exchange reflected in the GDP).

In Russia or China (and in some European countries like Spain or Portugal) that system does not exist. The doctors are simply employed by the government and you go there for free. Nothing is reflected in GDP.

In the US 20% of the GDP correspond to medical spends.

This is the reason of why when neoliberals (like Thatcher or Milei) arrive to a country and start to privatize everything (roads, medicine, education...) there is increase in the GDP but often reduction in the real production in the country.

You privatize roads, a new economical exchange appears that is reflected in the GDP. However nothing has been added to the real production of the country, that if something, is now more expensive because transport companies not have to pay to go by the roads.

It exist some level of correlation between GDP and the real economy, but is far looser than most people imagine.
Of course promoting GDP is very useful to push people like Milei to the power, so he privatize things that big investment companies can buy for a penny and then profit from it.
As those big investment companies are owners of all global media they have direct interest in promoting GDP as a measure of success, so people vote idiots like Milei, or support idiots like Gorbachev.


The reason for this is obvious coming from the name, GROSS domestic product. In accounting terms you are just counting income, without counting what you are spending to achieve that result.
If you are in a company, and your gross income is very high, but your spends to achieve that income are also very high you are in a worse position than a company with smaller gross but much smaller spends.

Of course this does not mean that US economy is shitty. US citizens are still the richest ones in the planet. But not so much as the nominal GDP or the per capita GDP in purchasing parity power suggest.
And overall, China being 4 times the US is a much bigger real economy than the US

It's not as simple as saying that some things are free so they don't factor in the GDP at all. The fact is that they do in fact factor in, they factor in as government spending. It's like Military spending, even though no one pays for it, but the government does, which is included in GDP statistics.

If a person doesn't pay for some service that is subsidized, their paycheck can now go on to something else, on the other hand the service is factored in as government spending.

GDP is by no means perfect, but it is not useless either. It's a decent first degree metric for judging the economic prowess of a nation.

GDP (nominal in current USD) is perhaps the best metric among everything discussed in this thread for judging overall economic power of a country. (in my opinion)
 

Santamaria

Junior Member
Registered Member
It's not as simple as saying that some things are free so they don't factor in the GDP at all. The fact is that they do in fact factor in, they factor in as government spending. It's like Military spending, even though no one pays for it, but the government does, which is included in GDP statistics.

If a person doesn't pay for some service that is subsidized, their paycheck can now go on to something else, on the other hand the service is factored in as government spending.

GDP is by no means perfect, but it is not useless either. It's a decent first degree metric for judging the economic prowess of a nation.

GDP (nominal in current USD) is perhaps the best metric among everything discussed in this thread for judging overall economic power of a country. (in my opinion)
This not true.

Public roads only count in the GDP when they are built.

Privatized roads count when they are built, when they are privatized and every time a driver pays to go through them. They inflate the GDP in at least a factor of 3. While in reality they weaken the productive economy because they increase cost for all business.

Public doctors count in GDP only when the state pays them salary. Privatized doctors count in the GDP when you pay your medical insurance, when you pay doctors, and when the medical insurance send you back the money.
Again inflating the GDP numbers.

That is why you see economical growth in countries when neoliberals won, but they don't increase their manufacturing, standards or life or nothing in general. It is artificial. You will see it now in Argentina.

GDP nominal is indeed a totally wrong metric to judge the power of a country. And GDP purchasing power also fails, although not so much.

Of course there is some loose correlation with real power. But in many instance it simply fails.

China is more powerful than the US economically. This is without any doubt. Any aspect of the economy you check China produces several times more things than the US, so by definition they are a more powerful economy. The only doubt with China US is who is the stronger military.

With Russia is even more obvious that is economically more powerful than Germany. Germany would not be able to grow like Russia in middle of 14000 sanctions, build the Crimea bridge as fast as Russia did or keep a army like Russia.
In case of Russia the nominal GDP is specially wrong because their currency is artificially depreciated and things are very cheap there.

I mean, the nominal GDP went to the extreme of saying that Spain is almost as powerful as Russia and Italy is more powerful. That is a joke that tells you everything you need to know about nominal GDP
 
Last edited:

didklmyself

Junior Member
Registered Member
"The uptick in exports is also partly due to a lower base in the same period last year, when exports declined 7.5%.

In comparison, exports grew by 1.5% in April compared to the same period last year while April imports rose by 8.4%."

Conclusion: Low growth, Balanced Export-Import Ratio
 

tphuang

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
thread on the import/export breakdown
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
's Jan-May
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
with ASEAN +10.8% y/y to 2.77 trillion yuan
EU -1.3% y/y to 2.23 trillion yuan
US +2% y/y to 1.87 trillion yuan
S.Korea +7.4% y/y to 0.927 trillion yuan
Japan -2.0% y/y to 0.88 trillion yuan
May exports (y/y):
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
products +9.41% to 5.35million tons
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
+3.2% to 2.59 mln tons
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
+35.86% to 6,217 tons
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
+5.26% to 61.46 mln units
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
+29.32% to 569k units
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
+18% to 25.27 billion units
some good stuff in there from automakers and IC industry
 

luminary

Senior Member
Registered Member
China has slowed its gold buying? Or is this just a hiccup.

I can understand a little due to record gold prices. What other stable assets can they start acquiring in bulk?
 
Top