Chinese Economics Thread

[Deleted member 24525]

If you don't know that the burden of proof is on you to support your own claim, there is no point for me to continue the debate.

Sarcastically imitating what I said earlier doesn't make you clever, especially when it was you who started this by rushing to defend Russia's honor the second someone else made a sober appraisal of their capabilities.

Your argument is glaringly inconsistent. You say Australia is wealthy because of natural resources. Russia is far richer in natural resources than Australia, yet has a per capita output less than the PRC. Simply refusing to acknowledge this obvious problem doesn't make it go away.

 

[SanWenYu]

Sarcastically imitating what I said earlier doesn't make you clever, especially when it was you who started this by rushing to defend Russia's honor the second someone else made a sober appraisal of their capabilities.

Your argument is glaringly inconsistent. You say Australia is wealthy because of natural resources. Russia is far richer in natural resources than Australia, yet has a per capita output less than the PRC. Simply refusing to acknowledge this obvious problem doesn't make it go away.

Being rude does make you winning. Not only you don't respect the rule of debate, you have a problem in comprehension, too.

 

[Deleted member 24525]

Being rude does make you winning. Not only you don't respect the rule of debate, you have a problem in comprehension, too.

Sea Lion

 

[coolgod]

Go to bed 红子

I hope you realize most of the insults you wrote in Chinese is incomprehensible. Gotta update that Chinese localization pack first.

 

[Deleted member 24525]

I hope you realize most of the insults you wrote in Chinese is incomprehensible.

If you had actually spent appreciable time in mainland China you would know an obvious reference to the phrase "小粉红" when you saw it.

 

[Blitzo]

If you had actually spent appreciable time in mainland China you would know an obvious reference to the phrase "小粉红" when you saw it.

Unironically using those terms here is not a good look.

 

[Deleted member 24525]

Unironically using those terms here is not a good look.

Alright

 

[coolgod]

If you had actually spent appreciable time in mainland China you would know an obvious reference to the phrase "小粉红" when you saw it.

I was always under the impression Mr. "communist who loves the party" didn't have a good grasp of Chinese when he repeatedly accused various SDF members of being 小粉红.

 

[Deleted member 24525]

I was always under the impression Mr. "communist who loves the party" didn't have a good grasp of Chinese when he repeatedly accused various SDF members of being 小粉红.

Chinese language or politics? The term refers to vitriolic young ultra nationalists on the Chinese internet.
If you disagree with this characterization then fine but that's what the term means.

 

[Blitzo]

Chinese language or politics? The term refers to vitriolic young ultra nationalists on the Chinese internet.
If you disagree with this characterization then fine but that's what the term means.

The reason why that term is problematic in this setting, is because it is used in a manner to used in circles which are often anti-china manner to exaggerate pro-China views even when they are not extreme, or not within the bounds of reason. The term itself also carries with it the connotation that any pro-China views or Chinese nationalism is by nature unreasonable, naive, and lacking in depth.

Or course, there's nothing wrong with the term being used just as there are countless terms for mocking any stripe of nationalism or political orientation no matter the country or alignment.

But using the term here (on a forum whose community and userbase is oriented openly in a more pro China manner than other forums) means you will be challenged on it by others, and if you are stating that you have an "order-of-magnitude deeper understanding of and support for its governing entity and national system in every way" then that is just going to cause even more skepticism.