I used to think you were a think tankie, siege, but now I see my mistake. You're actually the chief editor of The Economist.
Those damn cheapskates haven't paid me a red cent for my insightful analysis.
I used to think you were a think tankie, siege, but now I see my mistake. You're actually the chief editor of The Economist.
The data is good, comparison is not accurate. Should had used both 2022 and 2019 for comparison
China in the last decade hasn’t engaged in 0% interest rate and QE and is now benefitting from both lower inflation and lower interest rates.
This is interesting here. Now that China has the lowest bond yield and interest rate around, it does help certain industries. But I would say they will be wise to lock in their finances and work out some of the debt issues they have. You don't want a situation where interest payment on your debt it so high that your govt becomes non functional or you have to print so much money that your currency loses value (like in JPY)
Note that the US has veto power over major IMF decisions including changes in voting quota.IMF chief wants to increase China’s voting power, which is now only 6% — while China’s GDP is almost 18% of the world’s GDP.
Basically IMF wants Chinese money.
The head of the IMF has backed reforms that could eventually give Beijing more voting power within the fund, warning of “devastation” if the institution remains without adequate financial resources to aid struggling countries. In an interview with the Financial Times, Kristalina Georgieva called for the IMF to better represent changes in the global economy over the past decade, which include the rise of China.
However, the question of reallocating shares, especially to increase Beijing’s voting rights, remains a sensitive issue. While the U.S. has left the door open to such reallocations in the future, it has reportedly signaled its intention to veto any immediate expansion of China’s voting rights.