I was worried about the unemployment rate, but not anymore. Chinese data is wider than in other countries plus record graduates are coming into the market. Youth Unemployment rate I believe will fall in the next few years
Read the below thread
I was worried about the unemployment rate, but not anymore. Chinese data is wider than in other countries plus record graduates are coming into the market. Youth Unemployment rate I believe will fall in the next few years
It all boils down to technology. Improving quality of life is only possible through improving technology - more access to energy, better material conditions, better medicine, etc. are just synonyms for better technology. The only thing that separates us from cavemen is technology.Yes, technology is great but its an end to a means, not an end all. Same applies to GDP growth. What matters is improving the quality of life and standard of living for the greatest number of Chinese possible. Not everyone can be a great scientist / engineer, but should still be able to enjoy a productive and prosperous life.
It's not true, the USSR was horrifically bad at diffusing technology. It repeatedly was the first to invent an industrial technology, or among the first to use it, and the last to roll it out in any meaningful scale. It only excelled in areas with little civilian application like rockets or marine nuclear technology, or in those where the civilian and military applications were very similar, like aerospace. In others it struggled because it just couldn't get the technology out to most factories. This was an issue with complicated political causes that were ultimately about the structure of the USSRs planning bureaucracy. I know of a paper with empirical data on Soviet technology diffusion and will post a link when I find it.
there's also the skyrocketing enrollment in tertiary and post-tertiary education to train next generation of elite scientists and engineers.
STEM wages are dictated by market. If anything, access to higher quality engineers/scientists for much less cost is one of China's primary competitive advantages. The fact that wages are so highly inflated in certain STEM fields in the US indicate a shortfall of STEM talent.
If anything, that's much more of a problem in America where the best and brightest are siphoned off into parasitic fields like finance which create no value. Being a scientist or engineer there is half a step above failure and your career is considered socially mediocre at best. This is ultimately the reason why America's industrial economy is eviscerated and why the Pentagon pays $1,400 for coffee cups.
This is the crux of our disagreement. You consider money to be the driving force of an economy while I consider it secondary.
Is it not actually a good thing for consumption that real estate collapse in value? People are only afraid to have kids, afraid to spend because they are spending a significant chunk of their lives saving for a house deposit, nobody would save money and be more willing to spend if housing wasn't so ridiculously expensive that it basically needs funding from 6 people (partners and their parents) for the average Joe to be achievable.
公知 and their Dunning–Kruger effect, thinks the majority of Chinese people doesn't know how to pull up a long term FX chart.The average person in China sees RMB depreciating vs. the USD. Therefore, in their eyes, the USD is more valuable than RMB - you can ackshually all you want, but the average Chinese person does not see it this way. You can gripe about how they're not educated, or unaware, but 'crying abt it' doesn't change their perceptions.
That is an argument that would've been relevant before all the 公知 types got cancelled.公知 and their Dunning–Kruger effect, thinks the majority of Chinese people doesn't know how to pull up a long term FX chart.
That is an argument that would've been relevant before all the 公知 types got cancelled.
There were 120 electric and plug-in hybrid vehicles in Singapore in 2016, and there are now 7,961 today. Majority of them are Chinese.There were 50 family offices in Singapore in 2018, and there are now 1500 today. Majority of them are Chinese.
Consumers don't give a rats ass about where they buy their cars as long as its good. Just like how capital doesn't give a rats ass about what nation it is in as long as it generates returns. Thank you for proving my point.There were 120 electric and plug-in hybrid vehicles in Singapore in 2016, and now there are 7,961 today. Majority of them are Chinese.
You're not the only one who knows how to write non sequiturs.
"Increase in the number of registered family offices in a Chinese speaking tax haven over the past five years must imply Chinese people can't read FX charts and are therefore moving money out of China due to their perception of Yuan devaluation."Consumers don't give a rats ass about where they buy their cars as long as its good. Just like how capital doesn't give a rats ass about what nation it is in as long as it is treated well. Thank you for proving my point.