Zero Hedge is not part of the main stream media and is consider to be a "dissident" website. I take China's problem's seriously, the problem with the western media regarding China is that they cried wolf so many times that they have now lost all their credibility to speak and people respond as "just another China collapse story". But like with the story with the boy that cried wolf one day the wolf will be at the door. Rather China's economy is going to "collapse" is hard to say. But the problem with China is overcapacity in it's economy and a inefficient state own sector. China needs to shed this by allowing them to go bankrupt just like it happened in the 1990's when China took the painful decision to allow a lot of state owned enterprises to go bankrupt and promote privately owned enterprises and got more than a decade of astonishing growth. They need to allow property developers that cannot repay their loans to go bankrupt and they need to allow banks to work through their non performing loans and perhabs break them up and allowing some to go bankrupt. This is what should have happened in Japan in 1990, the US in 2008 and Europe in 2010 and they didn't allow it to happen and now are facing depression like conditions. To China's government's credit they haven't gone for a massive stimulas program like in 2008 and has been putting the breaks on property price rises. The 150 basis point drop of bank RRR is fair because of capital outflows, but the 56 basis point drop in interest rate is not and it's helping more speculation and create more non performing loans. One of the things that i disagree with Zero hedge is that they draw a straight line between GDP growth and electricity use. They say that because electricity use has gone down so much that the economy must be crashing. But the fact is that there are other factors at play like the increase of energy efficiency in the Chinese industry, a fast growing services sector that is low on energy intensity, the increase use of solar energy that is sometime of the grid and yes economic slowdown. The increase use of alternative energy like hydro, solar, wind and nuclear energy and others may also help in part to explain the pile up of coal which they use as another indicator of China's slowing economy. China is slowing no doubt but perhabs not as bad as the media wants to make it out to be.
I agree with you. China needs to shrink the state sector and increase the share of the private sector in the economy. Looking at the recent industrial profits, the stated owned enterprises (SOE) profits were down, private business profits were up. I have been encouraged that private capital has been allowed to enter the state controlled sectors. Moving in the right direction imo.
Electricity consumption is a measure of the manufacturing sector. About 80% of the total electricity consumed is used by the manufacturing sector, so if the manufacturing sector slows, overall electricity consumption will fall since its vastly skewed towards manufacturing. Electricity consumption in the service sector and residential sector has increased, although electricty consumed in the agricultural and manufacturing sectors have decreased. So electricity consumption is a poor measure of the overall economy.
Service sector has been cushioning the slowdown in the manufacturing sector. If we had strong domestic consumption, the manufacturing sector would still have the domestic market to sell into, but since the manufacturing sector is heavily reliant on the overseas markets, its been suffering. The service sector is also a big labour absorber, it employs more people per unit of GDP than the manufacturing or construction sectors. Service sector has alot to do with domestic consumption, so the growth in the service sector is a sign that domestic consumption is starting to pick up. The logistics sector is vital because if the logistics costs are too high in transporting, storage and management, then the overall retail prices for goods will be very high and consumers wont be able to afford those goods.
Premier Wen recently announced cutting more red tape in regulations. The regulatory burden must be cut for small and medium enterprises (SME).
Yes I am glad no big stimulus has been announced because the last stimulus caused 3 big problems 1) high inflation 2) property bubble 3) increased local government debt.
Instead of big fiscal expenditures, stimulus can come from removing unecessary regulations, lowering taxes, improving access to capital for SME, etc.
One of the biggest problems for SMEs is the lack of access to capital. Since most of the capital they get is through bank loans, if banks decide they dont want to loan to risky SMEs and instead lend to big SOEs, then the SMEs are starved of capital. Countries like the US have well developed capital markets SMEs can access to get capital and not rely solely on bank loans, but in china, the capital markets are under developed so chinese SMEs dont have the access to the different sources of capital like US SMEs have. But progress has been made in this areas by the introduction of the high yield bonds (junk bonds) for SMEs. But clearly more needs to be done. OTC markets must be developed too.
China is clearly slowing, and will continue to slow further in 3rd quarter and 4th quarter, but to say its crashing is false. If the private sector is allowed to grow and allow the state sector to shrink, then in the long term this will be very healthy for china. State sector uses too much inputs(land, labour and capital) to produce too little output. Private sector is very efficient in using those limited resources and getting higher output as the free market is allowed to function properly and thus allocates those limited resouces to viable businesses.
Inefficient businesses should be allowed to go bankrupt and industries need to consolidate by M&A, all these things will create a very strong economy in the long term.
I am in favour of cutting the RRR but raising the interest rates. Cutting RRR adds more liqudity into the economy which is needed but I want a higher cost of capital (higher interest rates).
Last edited: