Chinese Economics Thread

Chish

Junior Member
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Sweet CNN
View attachment 90360
CNN is not telling the whole truth and the title is wrong. They are wrong to imply that China is "uninvestable" last year because they conveniently left out the fact that direct foreign investment in China in 2021 was a record high.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
And CNN is wrong to imply that China is making a "comeback" this year because DFI have never stop following in inspite of all the negatives they mentioned i.e tech cracked downs, Real estate stumbles and locked downs.
The direct and indirect consequences of the Ukraine war, covid locked downs, supply chains troubles and inflations all over the world resulted in a net positives for China, thus more foreign investments. And CNN is spinning it as a "comeback".
 

weig2000

Captain
Here is how China can store natural gas . They should built ten if not hundred such facilities
China's energy giant Sinopec on Thursday put into use the country's deepest underground natural gas salt cavern storage well, with an injection volume of 190,000 cubic meters made on the first day. The newly-opened Wangchu-6 well, part of salt cavern storage known as Jianghan, runs more than 2,000 meters deep. With a designed capacity of holding up to 4.8 billion cubic meters of gas, Jianghan is scheduled to swing into full operation in 2026.


To put the designed capacity of the storage facility in perspective, in 2021 China imported 16.5 billion cubic meters of gas from Russia. So the facility can store 29% of the annual gas import from Russia.
 

Overbom

Brigadier
Registered Member
I am now convinced that the main theme of Xi's third term is going be (much-needed) centralisation.

Just one example, a unified domestic market would be revolutionary if it happened
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
The country defines a unified domestic market as being highly efficient, rule-based, fair and open. It will remove local protectionism, market segmentation and impediments restricting economic circulation, thus facilitating the smooth flow of products and resources on a larger scale.
 

NiuBiDaRen

Brigadier
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Yamaha Musical Instruments be like:

spongebob-cant-breathe.gif
 

Overbom

Brigadier
Registered Member
How does a "unified domestic market" interact with regional inequality across China and policies intended to address this?
Who knows.. That's probably going to be a big thing for Xi's third term. Too many interests involved on local protectionism.
Maybe they will start by putting up some clear red lines on what is not allowed to do and then start slowly building up these rules

Obviously the curent system of every local governement adding barriers to companies entering their market is not sustainable.
 
Last edited:

gelgoog

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
A unified market will decimate smaller and mid size companies. It will cause a lot of job losses. But it will be necessary for more Chinese companies to be able to reach critical mass to reach global scale and increase investment in R&D. The government will have to compensate the losers somehow to keep social justice.
 

Overbom

Brigadier
Registered Member
A unified market will decimate smaller companies and cause a lot of job losses. But it will be necessary for more Chinese companies to be able to reach critical mass to reach global scale and increase investment in R&D. The government will have to compensate the losers somehow to keep social justice.
Not only that. It also includes the politicians career.

Today they can say " I cultivated X market entities, including X high-tech companies and X companies witn RMB >500m revenue." Look how good I have been as an administrator/politician/policy maker, give that promotion now!

Something along those lines. Cultivating strong local companies is a strong signal/indication that you are good at your job and you should be promoted. However, as usual, they manage to find tricks on this. They put up local barriers to external companies outside of their local gov jurisdiction and thus give space for local companies to grow.

What this does for China as a whole, is to build up many small sized companies but less huge companies with enough revenue base to compete globally and perform cutting edge R&D.

I can't even imagine how difficult it is going to be to start changing this system
 

AndrewS

Brigadier
Registered Member
A unified market will decimate smaller and mid size companies. It will cause a lot of job losses. But it will be necessary for more Chinese companies to be able to reach critical mass to reach global scale and increase investment in R&D. The government will have to compensate the losers somehow to keep social justice.

In the long-run, if a unified market results in larger and more efficient companies, it's something that has to happen.
 
Top