Forget about "unintended consequences," that might be a bit too deep for them. They probably don't even understand the "consequences" part. For them it was probably:They still want decoupling but on their terms; and where they can inflict the maximum possible damage.They forgot that the law of unintended consequences still exists.
I think China should let its currency weaken a bit. The US as it did 10-15 years ago tacitly allowed countries to devalue their currencies. China was likely threatened with currency manipulator status if it did the same. The result was China becoming a lot less competitive. For example, look at this:View attachment 87888
China's current account balance for Q1 2022 is out. Highest deficit for energy every recorded (yellow), but more than balanced out by the highest non-commodities surplus ever. Even if low may be slower this year than planned, the currency should not weaken much, and could possibly even strengthen.
Agree with your reason, but the caveat must be that depreciation is done as a temporary measure in the face of multiple headwinds. Aka depreciate the yuan to increase exports to soften the blow of COVID, Russo-Ukraine war and deflating property sector. In the long run, China must still seek to wean itself off exports as a source of growth. In fact, the lower the % of Chinese GDP as exports, the better. This is the same as Chinese dependence on foreign technology. The less, the better. Optimal scenario would be zero dependence.I think China should let its currency weaken a bit. The US as it did 10-15 years ago tacitly allowed countries to devalue their currencies. China was likely threatened with currency manipulator status if it did the same. The result was China becoming a lot less competitive. For example, look at this:
View attachment 87900
The result was this:
View attachment 87901
This is the growth rate of Chinese exports over the year. Do you see how the growth slows suddenly and dramatically after 2012? It was growing 30% every year before that. USD appreciation against all currencies except Yuan was the reason for this. China was plaza accorded but in reverse. And China was an export economy while this was happening. The result?
View attachment 87902
9-10% growth rate suddenly fell to 6.5-7.5%. Yes. China was plaza accorded but it was not as effective as the US wanted so we had an overt trade war after that.
The same is happening again. All currencies losing value against the USD. The Japanese Yen lost 15%, Euro lost 15%, Won lost 5%. China is not an export economy anymore but I think it shouldn't play nice this time. 5-10% depreciation may benefit China a lot.
I both disagree and agree. Every relationship brings mutual interdependencies but China shouldn't be a walled garden. Walled gardens usually don't perform as well as they could. I would like China to be like the EU in trade openness when it becomes a fully developed country. Of course, tech self-sufficiency is a must so it will be a bit less open. And China is not an export economy anyway:Agree with your reason, but the caveat must be that depreciation is done as a temporary measure in the face of multiple headwinds. Aka depreciate the yuan to increase exports to soften the blow of COVID, Russo-Ukraine war and deflating property sector. In the long run, China must still seek to wean itself off exports as a source of growth. In fact, the lower the % of Chinese GDP as exports, the better. This is the same as Chinese dependence on foreign technology. The less, the better. Optimal scenario would be zero dependence.