Chinese Economics Thread

[DarkStar]

Understanding the tech war.. Best article I've read in a while

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Thank you for sharing a fantastic and well researched article detailing the existential battle that engulfs the Sino-U.S. conflict. The writer laid bare the current struggle and why it has come to this sorry state because it must which crystallize for me the necessity and the urgency for the U.S. to lose it's economic hegemony/stranglehold of the entire world where countries like China are expected to play their subservient role and no more.

The most disgusting thing in my view, is that after anglo america forced japan to hand over patents after the Plaza Accords, and after the US basically forced wealth and tech transfer to the anglos, the most disgusting thing is that anglo america did nothing with it, nothing that would benefit humanity as a whole.
All they did was produce shit and profits for themselves but no tangible tech advancements, no moon bases, no interstellar drives, no antigravity, no anti cancer meds, nothing that stealing japan's tech would have entailed.

Continuing to have anglo america as the hegemon is to condemn the rest of the world into a Dark Age of ignorance and religious hysteria.

China is pro science, rational and favour pragmatism; if we're going to see humanity as an interstellar species, it will be with Chinese taikonauts at the helm of fusion powered starships, using quantum comms and drives to travel into deep space.

 

[Xizor]

Any Chinese inkjet equivalent here?

Unlikely. OLEDs are very new to the scene. BOE is a state backed company and core technology innovation is likely very small - especially when compared to Samsung and LG.
BOE's target seems to be cornering the market first and then innovate. Atleast that's what I've understood.
The issue here is that BOE's revenue come overwhelmingly from LCDs and not OLEDs. BOE has only recently started to do OLEDs ( with Kateeva printers).

 

[Kancil]

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

If China removes capital controls what happen if US FED secretly print trillions of USD and covertly pass onto Wall Street firms for them to invest in China, and literally buy up China? This possibility makes it unlikely China will remove capital controls. Even now without the FED help, those Wall Street vultures can inflict serious damage on the Chinese economy if capital controls is removed. The Yuan will have to be back-stopped by military power to internationalize. Or operate a parallel system of Yuan payment beyond the US control.

 

[Xizor]

Chinese and Turkish shipbuilders fight over Russian icebreaker dock​

No Russian company wanted to build a floating dock for the country's fleet of nuclear powered icebreakers. Instead, the contract has ended up in a corporate wrangle between a Chinese and Turkish yard.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

 

[krautmeister]

The most disgusting thing in my view, is that after anglo america forced japan to hand over patents after the Plaza Accords, and after the US basically forced wealth and tech transfer to the anglos, the most disgusting thing is that anglo america did nothing with it, nothing that would benefit humanity as a whole.
All they did was produce shit and profits for themselves but no tangible tech advancements, no moon bases, no interstellar drives, no antigravity, no anti cancer meds, nothing that stealing japan's tech would have entailed.

Continuing to have anglo america as the hegemon is to condemn the rest of the world into a Dark Age of ignorance and religious hysteria.

I understand your frustration with the anti-Human psychotic tendencies of the Anglo-Americans. However, saying they "wasted" their opportunity to create pie in the sky transcendental breakthroughs like "moon bases, no interstellar drives, no antigravity, no anti cancer meds" comes off as a sort of underhanded Anglo-American white supremacist compliment rather than an insult. Why insinuate this to be possible for the Anglo-Americans when everybody knows these sorts of near impossible accomplishments are the absolute pinnacle of achievements literally NOBODY is remotely close to achieving? I'm just saying, you actually sound like you are complimenting Anglo-American capability even though you are on the surface trying to appear critical. Food for thought.

 

[DarkStar]

I understand your frustration with the anti-Human psychotic tendencies of the Anglo-Americans. However, saying they "wasted" their opportunity to create pie in the sky transcendental breakthroughs like "moon bases, no interstellar drives, no antigravity, no anti cancer meds" comes off as a sort of underhanded Anglo-American white supremacist compliment rather than an insult. Why insinuate this to be possible for the Anglo-Americans when everybody knows these sorts of near impossible accomplishments are the absolute pinnacle of achievements literally NOBODY is remotely close to achieving? I'm just saying, you actually sound like you are complimenting Anglo-American capability even though you are on the surface trying to appear critical. Food for thought.

No, it's an indictment to the cultural greed and sociopathy of the anglo american mindset; after stealing japanese IP and semiconductor tech, they never thought to capitalise on that tech, certainly they were capable of it as lasers in the 70s, carl sagan and steve jobs et al demonstrated, but rather, a distinct lack of will and courage to pursue these scientific pursuits was evident because their priorities lay in ensuring they could continue to sit like feudal lords over the enslaved coloured masses on non whites.

This anti scientific and anti life philosophy is evident in the christian fascism of the US powerbroker elites eg Pompeo, Cotton etc.

However, i remain confident that China has the potential for humanity to reach fusion tech/ alcubierre drives, antimatter tech etc given the advances we've seen coming from China these past 2 decades.

 

[DarkStar]

Why insinuate this to be possible for the Anglo-Americans when everybody knows these sorts of near impossible accomplishments are the absolute pinnacle of achievements literally NOBODY is remotely close to achieving? I'm just saying, you actually sound like you are complimenting Anglo-American capability even though you are on the surface trying to appear critical. Food for thought.

When the United States can afford to destroy other nations and force the best and brightest to come to the US, so that the anglos can continue to exploit the intelligence and creativity for their own purposes, it baffles me that these technologies have not come about especially when we can readily see with china that groundbreaking technologies are coming about eg quantum comms, railgun, hypersonic, fusion research, nuclear tech et al

 

[Tyler]

Unlikely. OLEDs are very new to the scene. BOE is a state backed company and core technology innovation is likely very small - especially when compared to Samsung and LG.
BOE's target seems to be cornering the market first and then innovate. Atleast that's what I've understood.
The issue here is that BOE's revenue come overwhelmingly from LCDs and not OLEDs. BOE has only recently started to do OLEDs ( with Kateeva printers).

Apple is already using BOE screens on the iPhone?

 

[siegecrossbow]

Apple is already using BOE screens on the iPhone?

I don't think so. Apple is reducing Chinese components on their new phones.

 

[Tam]

Apple is already using BOE screens on the iPhone?

Yes they are for IPhone 12 and 13.