Chinese Economics Thread

spring2017

New Member
Registered Member
Exactly these female ABC is race traitor they only care advancing herself like Melissa Chan under the disguise of hate CCP but Love China
Hi Hendrik, I enjoyed many of your informative posts. In the meantime I would like to discuss a little about "race traitor".

I agree that the likes of Melissa Chan are despicable. But to me, it is not because they are ABC "race traitor", but they would lie for personal gains, and they stand on the opposite side of the history and masses.

By siding with "Han" Chinese, the Tibetans may be argued as "race traitors", but they are in fact part of the effort to bring a people from medieval serfdom to modern society.

The Chinese liberation of Tibet should be hailed, but I think not because that China conquered a piece of land, but because the liberation has brought better lives to Tibetan masses.

For the same reason that the USSR's liberation of Afghanistan (or Manchuria) should be hailed by the working people of the world, while U.S.A's "liberation" of Afghanistan or Iraq should opposed.

Moreover, the advance of a socialist state, such as Soviet occupation of Afghanistan, or Chinese occupation of SCS islands, should be hailed, as it strengthened the defense and struggle against the world capitalist/imperialist system, which is the root of war and hunger in this day of plenty.

Again, thanks for many of your excellent posts.
 

voyager1

Captain
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
The European Parliament warned China on Thursday it won’t ratify a long-awaited business investment deal as long as sanctions against European Union legislators remain in place.
Lmao are they saying that if China doesn't drop its sanctions, that EU will then damage its own economy?

If EU wants to shoot its own foot then it is welcome to do so. I am sure that China and the US wont object to that.
This EU Parliament is of a seriously low caliber.
 

AssassinsMace

Lieutenant General
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
That shows how weak the EU is. They froze the investment deal because of human rights concerns. Now they're threatening to freeze it again if China doesn't repeal their retaliatory sanctions on EU officials. So if China complies does that mean the EU is going ahead with the deal or does it only remove latest freeze meaning China still has to comply over human rights charges in order for the first freeze to be dropped? If anyone believes the charges of imbalance of trade in China's favor, the investment deal is more important to the EU than China.
 

antiterror13

Brigadier
That shows how weak the EU is. They froze the investment deal because of human rights concerns. Now they're threatening to freeze it again if China doesn't repeal their retaliatory sanctions on EU officials. So if China complies does that mean the EU is going ahead with the deal or does it only remove latest freeze meaning China still has to comply over human rights charges in order for the first freeze to be dropped? If anyone believes the charges of imbalance of trade in China's favor, the investment deal is more important to the EU than China.

The more you give, the more they want ...... even if let say China lifted the sanctions ... do you really think it would stop there ?, absolutely not, also the whole world would see how weak China was
 

spring2017

New Member
Registered Member
"Deng Xiaoping did, in fact, briefly try “Big Bang” overhauls, which led to corruption, inflation and mass protests on Tiananmen Square that almost cost the Communist Party its grip on power."

It is very rare for any western scholar to talk about this true root of Tiananmen Square demonstration. Most of them erroneously but conveniently depicted it as anti-communist. It was anti-corruption, anti-capitalist, and pro-socialist.

The song Internationale was one of the most popular one heard in the demonstrations.

Thankfully, capitalist restoration did not happen in China, otherwise China would have been another Russia (and without the technology and nuclear arms)
 

krautmeister

Junior Member
Registered Member
It is very rare for any western scholar to talk about this true root of Tiananmen Square demonstration. Most of them erroneously but conveniently depicted it as anti-communist. It was anti-corruption, anti-capitalist, and pro-socialist.
It is rare to start with, but it's made even more rare by the censoring of those voices unofficially from the press, unofficially from social media and unofficially through societal pressure. It's basically mostly driven by hatred, racism and xenophobia. That's what happens when you're fed a steady diet of propaganda over many decades. At the end of that process of brainwashing, you will even believe things like Chinese bat soup restaurants serving bear balls for dessert, swilled down with panda bear pee. The brainwashing has become that insane!
 
Last edited:

hashtagpls

Senior Member
Registered Member
Wow did the VP (i assume Vice Premier) himself order the recent crackdown?

Something serious must be cooking up in Beijing



That would be wild. I can already hear the West's hysteria about it lol

But yes, I also agree that this must have something to do with DCEP

China aint playing around after the Trump sanctions. It is going straight for US's throat by introducing DCEP and banning any cryptocurrency competition ASAP

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Lmao are they saying that if China doesn't drop its sanctions, that EU will then damage its own economy?

If EU wants to shoot its own foot then it is welcome to do so. I am sure that China and the US wont object to that.
This EU Parliament is of a seriously low caliber.

That shows how weak the EU is. They froze the investment deal because of human rights concerns. Now they're threatening to freeze it again if China doesn't repeal their retaliatory sanctions on EU officials. So if China complies does that mean the EU is going ahead with the deal or does it only remove latest freeze meaning China still has to comply over human rights charges in order for the first freeze to be dropped? If anyone believes the charges of imbalance of trade in China's favor, the investment deal is more important to the EU than China.
It's quite amusing to see here actually; these MEPS betray their own nation states for anglo American interests in the hopes of choice post political office careers in the private sector...only to face blacklisting and having that million dollar paycheque denied to them because no white western company wants to be sanctioned by China.

Pompeo, Tugendhat et al are going to be facing impoverishment after political life because of Chinese sanctions. It's a beautifully elegant Chinese response at the corruption and vulnerabilities of white democracies.

These MEPs are trying to hold europe hostage because they fear for their careers after office; sooner or later, the moneyed elites of europe are going to have to step in...unless of course they relish being bitches of the anglos as the australians do.
 
Top