This is unsustainable and is literally the thesis behind Involution. South Korea, Japan, and Taiwan went down this route of not explicitly forcing wages or job benefits up and basically all their young people either left the country or they decided to drop out of society. Also, cratering birth rates.
We are already seeing the leading edges of this phenomenon with the rise of 内卷 as an intellectual concept and the rise of Chinese neets, return to agriculture advocates, etc.
There are intense and negative trickle down social effects that unglue society itself from thinking zero-sum hyper competition is sufficient to force people to work. If I were a mainland worker not on the high end of the scale, I'd be insanely worried if I knew someone who thought like you was in a PRC ministry level position.
I said high consumer consumption was not a requirement for a society to get to high-income status.
That is not the same as saying consumer consumption is not relevant.
I agree that South Korea, Taiwan and Japan have problems due to low wages and that a high minimum would help solve many of these issues.
I already did a post a few week's ago that based on the experiences of the UK, France and Germany - a minimum wage of $13-$15 per hour should be feasible for the USA.
The same argument applies to South Korea, Taiwan and Japan
Wrong on the first bolded point. Not everyone can enter a higher value add industry and you need to have wages for lower skill jobs like janitorial staff wages track with cost of living increases.
I think it is obvious that there aren't enough high-value add jobs for everyone, nor is everyone suited to such jobs.
But it is these sorts of jobs and industries which produce the surplus wealth required if you want to redistribute.
And a high minimum wage is one of the methods to do this.
Additionally, while R&D may be a necessary pre-requisite for a high income society, it is not a sufficient replacement for wage increases.
I think you misunderstand the causality.
High levels of R&D spending
always results in a high-income society. That is what the real-life data shows.
But a high-income society doesn't have to be based on R&D.
They can be based on natural resources, as you mentioned previously.
My position is largely in line with the CPC on this one and if you want to argue that the Chinese government is also stupid to put so much emphasis on consumer demand (i.e. household income) then be my guest.
A few weeks ago, we already had a discussion which looked at how in the USA, all the economic gains for the past 20+ years had accrued to the top whilst wages for the average worker had been stagnant for decades.
For janitorial staff in the US, I would support an eventual minimum wage of $15 per hour (2000+ USD per month), like we already see in Western Europe. In the case of China, the question is how fast minimum wages should increase, which is a difficult call.
And where did I say the Chinese government is stupid for focusing on consumption?
My point is that technology upgrading comes first.
Then there's the spare resources for higher consumption by lower income earners.