Would you both please - as per the rules - at least add a personnel opinion or sentence to your post. You surely know, that posting only links without anything more is against the rules.
Chinese Economics Thread
- Thread starter Norfolk
- Start date
Would you both please - as per the rules - at least add a personnel opinion or sentence to your post. You surely know, that posting only links without anything more is against the rules.
Jura The idiot
General
Deino who's "both" in your post in blue above?
one is me (thought it's obvious my point has been the timeline
Mar 5, 2019
Monday at 8:20 PM
of the GDP growth data and their presentation),
but whom else did you mean?
I want to know so that I can compare his/her content to what I've posted
one is me (thought it's obvious my point has been the timeline
Mar 5, 2019
Monday at 8:20 PM
of the GDP growth data and their presentation),
but whom else did you mean?
I want to know so that I can compare his/her content to what I've posted
SamuraiBlue
Captain
Jura The idiot
General
Tuesday at 8:48 AM
China is honoring trade deal; it’s the US’ turn
with an interesting Dec. 26 speculation inside,
and
Xi says phase-one China-U.S. trade deal benefits both sides, world
Xinhua| 2019-12-21 04:44:03
also mentioning Taiwan etc.
related views by Chinese sources:
China is honoring trade deal; it’s the US’ turn
with an interesting Dec. 26 speculation inside,
and
Xi says phase-one China-U.S. trade deal benefits both sides, world
Xinhua| 2019-12-21 04:44:03
also mentioning Taiwan etc.
Jura The idiot
General
Glob. Times sounding desperate, even quoting
Matthew 22:21
!!
Banning Huawei will cost US opportunity in 5G era
the context is "The final version of the defense bill contains new restrictions meant to prevent the administration from taking Huawei off a Commerce Department list that bans American firms from working with the company without specific exemptions." ()
Matthew 22:21
!!
Banning Huawei will cost US opportunity in 5G era
the context is "The final version of the defense bill contains new restrictions meant to prevent the administration from taking Huawei off a Commerce Department list that bans American firms from working with the company without specific exemptions." ()
I have said Xi is going to sign an unequal treaty. Someone should edit the Wiki-page about unequal treaties when he sends Vice-Premier Liu He to sign the unequal treaty ('phase one trade deal') in January 2020. Mao and Deng are spinning in their graves. Really, really disappointed with Xi. Maybe it's time that he will be removed from office including Li Keqiang and Liu He and appoint people that will fight for Chinese sovereignity and dignity instead of being a sell-out and giving huge concessions on a platter to the US.
manqiangrexue
Brigadier
Could you point out the part that bothers you? Because I haven't seen anything that fundamentally alters the big trend that China will continue growing quickly and the US will continue growing relatively slowly. I see nothing enforceable and nothing that provides additional safety or such for the IP of American companies that want to do business in the Chinese market. If you see something, point it out. From what I see, China said that it will buy more US goods over 2 years (so no lump sum and something they can always halt and hold over America's head should things go sour) and none of the fundamental alterations to China's economy or the economic relationship between the two countries that America wanted. I think you're falling for Trump's trick, which is to make a deal that has little to no impact and then brag about it being a success to his voters.
The biggest fundamental and lasting take-way from this is that now, Chinese companies are striving to develop indigenous tech rather than relying on American parts and the average Chinese consumer has become much more politically-conscious when making purchases.
AssassinsMace
Lieutenant General
Buying more US goods isn't really a problem. It's not that much more than before Trump started his trade war. I haven't heard anything of the more outrageous demands Trump made earlier like the US has a say and an US official gets posted in Beijing that gets to oversee all of China's economic planning or how the US can slap tariffs while China cannot. Just the idea of a "phase one" deal is Trump spinning victory out of him getting less than he promised to his voters. Are we really going to see a "phase two"? Only if he gets elected for a 2nd term. He had to get some sort of a deal done before the election. Here in the US, I mostly hear how this is a horrible deal or falls short of what Trump promised he would get from China. So if the deal was such a defeat for China and a win for the US, why would the US side want the deal killed?