Chinese AESA development

Hendrik_2000

Lieutenant General
"China is ahead of US in terms of miniturazation"???!!! could you provide proof.

The notion that China is backward in avionic and radar technology, is probably outdated by 20 years. China has succesfully put into serial production 3 different type of AESA. 2 large Radar designing Institute that has produced KLJ series radar. booming electronic industry. We get glimpse of advanced in the electronic from trade show like CIDEX
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


2) Chinese Defence Products Today: State-of-the Art

Chinese defence products were once thought of as being moderately capable copies of previous-generation hardware that contained attributes of Russian, European and Israeli designs. Some of those bloodlines can still be seen in their designs, but the products now being seen at an expo like CIDEX show that Chinese firms have capabilities that approach first world industrial, state-of-the-art levels of sophistication.

In the 1990s, when the Russian defence was in danger of drying up and closing its doors due to an almost complete collapse in any funding from their own government, it was China that saved the day. China bought billions in military hardware from Russia, but it also sent its engineers, designers and technicians to study inside of Russian industry to learn how the weapons it was purchasing had been developed in the first place.

This transfer of technological know-how, plus some enormous investments by the Chinese military into its state-owned industries (what more than one Russian has referred to as “uncontrolled and rampant modernisation”) has produced a defence electronics industry that far outstrips the size and capacity of that which existed in Russia when Chinese industry first began their cooperation with Moscow in the early 1990s.

[B]Today the former students (the Chinese) have become the masters. Chinese industry now has the ability to produce components that the Russian electronics industry (after almost two decades of no investment by their government) is no longer capable of either designing or manufacturing. The initial failure rates on the production of transmit/receive (T/R) modules for the Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) radars being designed for the Mikoyan MiG-35 and the Sukhoi T-50/PAK-FA 5th-generation fighter, for example, were so high that it would have bankrupted any western firm involved in a similar programme.

Not surprisingly, this year’s CIDEX show saw groups of Russian specialists going through the halls and looking for components that they could source out of China to be utilised in Russian-designed weapon systems. Russian specialists will point out that they are now at a huge disadvantage to the Chinese in two very significant respects.

One is that the commitment by the central government in resources to the defence electronics sector is both sustained and serious. “They can take a field where there is nothing but flat land and wild grass,” said one Russian company representative, “and the next thing you know there is a full-blown factory or design centre there turning out a world-class product.”
 

andyhugfan

Banned Idiot
There was a significant breaktrough some couple years ago with the transmit modules. Something like a huge rise in the transmit power was available. It was so much (x20 originally) that they had to adapt the whole cooling system of the radar.

I've read it somewhere a week ago, can't remember where, maybe ausairpower.

And with china, There's no doubt the j-10B, j-20 and the J-15 will house an AESA radar.
 

bladerunner

Banned Idiot
Well, more modules IS better, with a given quality, "efficiency" and whatever. I.e., the f-22's radar is unquestionably better than the f-35 radar. As to the comparison between these and the J-20's radar, assuming the information is right, it would mean one of two things: a) Chinese are ahead of the US in terms of miniaturization, or b) the J-20 simply fits a bigger radar. I would vote for the second alternative, although I would not be surprised if any gap existing between the US and China in radar technology closes before this airplane is in production. 5-7 years of development is a very very long time at China's pace of technological growth. My point is that there is an advantage in having an airframe that can fit a bigger array of t/r modules.

That only depends if the U.S. stood still and I really cant see that happening, as they are already saving a few billion on a monthly basis after pulling out of Iraq.
 

hanqiang1011

New Member
^^ J-10B has kinda lost its importance because the J-20! I wish there was more information on the progress of J-10B, which in my opinion would be inducted before the J-20. Technology's refinement and maturity makes the J-10B very important fighter-jet. Incorporation of AESA Radar, Divertless Supersonic Intakes (DSI), Thrust Vector Control (TVC), Conformal Fuel Tanks? (CFT?) and FWS-10 Engines. It is imperative for PLAAF power projection and should be the focus of attention with regards to the full-scale production of J-10B.

A fighter of J-10B's & J-11B's class has more than enough capability in it to challenge USAF's F-15s & F-16s! Also, J-15s is as important for PLAN and further refinements to the aircraft would ensure that PLAN can match USN's F/A-18E/Fs!

The J-10 series will not lose its importance even for the next 20 years in fact. The J5s were being retired after being the backbone for so many odd years. The J-10 series will slowly be equiped by all air squadons of PLAAF and PLANAF. It will be the backbone of the PLA air forces in years to come together. With the introduction of J-20, the PLA will not phased out the J-10 in favour of J-20 due to J-20's newly induction and high cost per unit. A 120 to 130 units of J-20s supported by this AESA radar together with 300+ J-10 will make the PLA muscle felt in Asia.
 

challenge

Banned Idiot
Nanjing radar already able to mass produce L,S and C band T/R Module,according to Chinese magazine, Chinese engineer learn a lot from Israel particular in the field of quality control.but the article do not mention X band t/R MMIC
 

SinoSoldier

Colonel
There have been many aircraft in PLAAF that have operational AESA radars.

Here is the list:
- J-10B: clearly indicates Chinese AESA radar, possibly the Type 1475
- J-11B: there are plans to incorporate AESA into all J-11B models
- J-15*: analysts pointed out that the nose of the J-15 is intended to use AESA radar
- J-16*: plans to use AESA. It is basically a "Silent Flanker"
- J-20*: plans to use Type 1475 radar
- JH-7B*: plans to use AESA radar. It is a stealth version of JH-7A
- KJ-2000: has Chinese L-band AESA radar
- Y-8 AWACS / electronic aircraft: probably use L-band AESA radar

Note: the aircraft that has a (*) have not entered service yet
 

tphuang

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
well, I'm quite confident about J-10B using AESA radar due to the shape of its nose. Let's wait to see J-11B using AESA radar before listing it. Same with J-15. As for J-16 and JH-7B, they are just speculated program.
 

SinoSoldier

Colonel
well, I'm quite confident about J-10B using AESA radar due to the shape of its nose. Let's wait to see J-11B using AESA radar before listing it. Same with J-15. As for J-16 and JH-7B, they are just speculated program.

There are many Chinese reports that state the existence of the JH-7B and J-16 program. Huitong reports them too. There's also another SAC stealth fighter-bomber program (Huitong calls it the J-18). The J-16 and the SAC fighter-bomber will fly in mid-2011. JH-7B flew last year. All of these planes will use AESA (most likely the Type 1475).

There are also a few reports of J-11B and J-15 planning to use AESA (I ain't making this up on my own). If that happens, that will be a great improvement of the J-11B.
 
Top