China is objectively a net contributor to human progress while so many vassals of a certain country like India, Uganda, etc are net contributors to human misery. Thus any criticism from foreigners is in bad faith if they do not have equal or greater critiques of these countries. Who cares if they judge, do they have the capability to carry out their judgments on China? No. Besides, everyone judges. Why didn't China do business with fascist military dictatorship Indonesia when it was genociding Chinese Indonesians in 1967? Their country their rules right? No.
The actual crime is hypocrisy. You either criticize all for the same action equally or you don't say anything at all. China has always been consistent: general noninterference, but specific calls for peace and moderation for emergency situations. Meanwhile some certain country is supporting xenophobic racist Is.rael and head chopping absolute monarchy Saudi, then criticizing China for so called 'human rights'. That is the distasteful part - hypocrisy. Voting against condemning Nazis and fascists while calling criticism of Is.rael 'antisemitic' is hypocrisy. China calling for peace and moderation from all factions and not doing business with a faction that refuses peace and moderation? Not hypocrisy.
Can athiests rebuild thier country, help them make money by creating win-win situations, not try to export thier ideology to thier country, let em do thier thing, build infrastructure, school, hospitals?whether a purportedly extreme fundamentalist islamist governing organization with a secured territory snd power base can be ideologically reconciled with not trying to detach traditionally islamic populations from the rule of infidels, and not just infidels, but atheists, which are regarded in islam as the worst of worst and far worse than “people of the book”, ie christians and jews, is yet to be seen.
Taliban will undoubtedly act moderate to secure power and avoid giving foreign military still with a toe hold in Afghanistan a reason to reverse their pull out and reason to interfere in Afghanistan internal power struggle when their attention is still fixed on Afghanistan.
But what they do once international attention on Afghanistan wanes and the Taliban subdued internal competitor to their power is yet to be seen. one could be sure their first and most important goal is not to modernize Afghanistan,
Than athiests can be the best of friends
Humans are just humans, they won't hurt anyone especially a hand that feeds you
No ideology in the world can change this basic human tendency
B- like I mentioned above in post # 192
Any gross abuse that thier neighbors are uncomfortable with "they should come together as a group and demand Taliban to stop a particular gross abuse" in exchange for recognition
Ofcourse you can't change thier whole ideology, they faught for it for decades but in exchange for carrots they can change some extreme abuses