Reckless. Incompetent. Adjectives not usually attached to rocket scientists. Sabotage? Just food for thought.
Rocket scientists are people too
Reckless. Incompetent. Adjectives not usually attached to rocket scientists. Sabotage? Just food for thought.
When they are rocket scientists, they are to be held in much higher standard than the rest of the people.Rocket scientists are people too
When they are rocket scientists, they are to be held in much higher standard than the rest of the people.
Would you like your airplane pilot to be excused for his mistakes with "pilots are people too?". What about your surgeon? Your explosives warehouse manager? Your nuclear plant operator? Your nuclear arsenal officer? etc
For some professions, there is no room for error. If they want to have the excuse of "we are people too", then leave the big bucks/responsibility job and do something else
At most their errors should be based on scientific errors but definitely not negligence
My opinion on this incident is this:When they are rocket scientists, they are to be held in much higher standard than the rest of the people.
Would you like your airplane pilot to be excused for his mistakes with "pilots are people too?". What about your surgeon? Your explosives warehouse manager? Your nuclear plant operator? Your nuclear arsenal officer? etc
For some professions, there is no room for error. If they want to have the excuse of "we are people too", then leave the big bucks/responsibility job and do something else
At most their errors should be based on scientific errors but definitely not negligence
Rocket science? Not exactly brain surgery, is it?When they are rocket scientists, they are to be held in much higher standard than the rest of the people.
Would you like your airplane pilot to be excused for his mistakes with "pilots are people too?". What about your surgeon? Your explosives warehouse manager? Your nuclear plant operator? Your nuclear arsenal officer? etc
For some professions, there is no room for error. If they want to have the excuse of "we are people too", then leave the big bucks/responsibility job and do something else
At most their errors should be based on scientific errors but definitely not negligence
That's why I lay the blame on officials and not the private company. The company will always push the envelope and it's the job of the gov to say hold up or say f. NOAlso, I hope it is not the case here but a lot of times local government act like absolute simps to these types of companies, this kind of practice is a good thing in and of itself but if they went easy on regulations because of it then we have a problem
Reckless. Incompetent. Adjectives not usually attached to rocket scientists. Sabotage? Just food for thought.
TJS-10 RPO with TJS-3TJS-10 seems to be an inspector GEO satellite like TJS-3
View attachment 130159
Creo que te estás ofreciendo como directora de relaciones públicas. Sí, lo harías muy bien. Deja tu currículum para que te llamen. jajajaMala disculpa. Ninguna explicación ni nada. Si lees la carta con atención, puedes ver que también son malos en relaciones públicas.
Incluso dicen que el cohete cayó en la zona segura prevista. ¿Ves? Todo según El Plan, en realidad son competentes jajaja
No se menciona que esto fue pura falta. Si el daño o los escombros hubieran sido un poco mayores, quién sabe, el cohete podría haber perdido por completo el control y haber ido directo a la zona urbana.
Basura dentro basura fuera