ESA provided two scientific instruments and
ground station support for Chang'e-6's return to Earth around June 25 but its future cooperation with China's lunar program probably ends here.
That raises a question as why Chang'e-6 took so much longer than Chang'5 mission. What was said in public is because of the retro-orbit of Chang'e-6. But there is another possibe explaination is that Chang'e-6 mission is an attempt of doing things without ESA graound station support, an verification test while ESA station is still available. I got this feeling when reading this article
In short, it says that China's deep space TT&C system is made of two networks 35m (antenna diameter) net and 18m net. The first has a coverage from 93-98% while the second from 68-90%. These coverage varies over hours in a day and days in a month. With ESA stations those gaps are covered, but without ESA there would be hours of blindness. Since the lengh of blindness change over a month, the better days for tracking are also spread out over a month. That leads to the mission being lenghened to make sure the longest coverage period for various communication and control activities, during the rest of time we are just waiting for the alignment of moon, earth and spacecraft.
I think China planned this (without ESA) long ago before the relationship went sour. China always plan for the worst even in the best time.