This is relevant how?In November a piece of the 2007 Chinese ASAT test was reported has having a near miss with ISS.
This is relevant how?In November a piece of the 2007 Chinese ASAT test was reported has having a near miss with ISS.
That‘s way toooooooooooooooooo close in space
Because it proves that these incidents are increasingly common. It’s what happens after over 70 years of objects being launched in overlapping orbits.
Controllable? How? It’s a nano sat it has no thrusters.There is a world of difference between a debris trajectory and one that is determinable and controllable.
Controllable? How? It’s a nano sat it has no thrusters.
What do you mean how? We are talking about Starlink satellites here. Of course they have thrusters (hall effect ion thrusters to be exact).Controllable? How? It’s a nano sat it has no thrusters.
The Thrusters burned up on insertion. The Starlink satellite is a box about the size of a PlayStation with an folded out solar panel/ antenna. The satellite is designed to be disposable it’s launched on a orbit intended to burn up in five years. It’s to small for a fuel tank.What do you mean how? We are talking about Starlink Sattelites here. Of course they have thrusters.
The Starlink satellites in question weigh ~250 kilograms and are equipped with hall effect ion thrusters. How do you think they reach their respective plane/slot of operation and conduct station keeping?Whataboutisum. The release is timed along a fixed trajectory. The potential of overlap between is astronomical.
The Thrusters burned up on insertion. The Starlink satellite is a box about the size of a PlayStation with an folded out solar panel/ antenna. The satellite is designed to be disposable it’s launched on a orbit intended to burn up in five years. It’s to small for a fuel tank.