China's Space Program News Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

by78

General
51969767560_9cc588274d_k.jpg
51969489734_b78c987878_k.jpg
51969269698_9fa387407c_k.jpg
51969269758_18559c8fae_k.jpg
51969269848_6fc1563821_k.jpg
 

by78

General
By the way, the LM-6A was launched from China's first smart, adaptable launch pad. The pad is designed to launch seven different models of carrier rockets, including LM-2, LM-4, and LM-6. Much of the pre-launch work – such as fueling – is now automated. Previously, ground staff are evacuated only 15 minutes before launch, now they are evacuated four hours before launch to a bunker two kilometers way, from where they remotely control and monitor pre-launch work.

51968197827_726cb0f5ea_k.jpg
51969488519_714bf105de_k.jpg
51969766305_64b5441027_k.jpg
51969766315_ae4c9551e3_k.jpg
51968197937_1768e14cc8_o.jpg
 

taxiya

Brigadier
Registered Member
To be more precise, this rocket is officially called 长征六号改(Chángzhēng-lìu hào Gǎi, CZ-6 Modified or Improved) but not 长征六号甲(Chángzhēng-lìu hào Jiǎ).

In Chinese, also used by CNSA formally, '甲'(Jiǎ) is the equivalent of 'A' or '1st' in English when naming rocket subtypes, and '改'(Gǎi, abbreviation for the word 改进gǎi jìn) is the equivalent of 'modified' or 'improved'.

I think maybe the difference is that 'A' or 'B' or so are for the rocket subtypes which share the basic architecture with the protptype and has just been slightly improved, while 'G' or 'M' are for the ones sharing the same technology but with diffrernt architecture.

CZ-6's first stage has only one YF-100 kerosene/LOX engine, and the second stage is 2.25m diameter with one 18t YF-115 engine. CZ-6G's first stage has two YF-100s and the second stage diametered 3.35m and also has one YF-115 engine.

The CZ-6 is designed to be horizontally assembled and tested and errected with TEL vehicle while the CZ-6G is vertically assembled and tested at the launch site.

They shared the same kerosene/LOX engine series YF-100/115 but with different engine numbers and stage diameter configurations and assembling methods. So they are more different from each others than the CZ-2/3/4 series.
No, the official designation is 长征六号甲 as it is painted as CZ-6A on the rocket. 改(Gai) was the temporary designation before official launch. The same applies to CZ-7A which was also called CZ-7G during development.
 

taxiya

Brigadier
Registered Member
The efficiency of a rocket is not good. 540t for 4-ton payload into 700km SSO: not great mass ratio
China's rockets' capacity/mass ratio are worse than US and Russia, that is well known. It should not surprise anybody.

However, I hope you are not comparing this SSO with LEO ratio of other rockets. Besides, other liquid + SRB rocket uses LH2, CZ-6A uses Kerosene, so it is natural that it has worse ratio.
 

taxiya

Brigadier
Registered Member
I don't know 4t to SSO is the capability for which configuration.

Correction: In the report I quoted in Chinese, it said '700公里太阳同步轨道运载能力不小于4吨' (not less than 4 tons payload for 700km SSO orbit injection), not 4t max.

And also, SSO capability is always much less than LEO capability, maybe 40%-50%.
It is slightly less than 4.5t, close to CZ-8.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top