@Jono bro the MOA is a positive first step BUT Duterte can't move it forward, the deal was sign in Nov 2018 right after the midterm election, so he can't use his political influence over the legislature, in effect he become a lame duck, only those with presidential aspiration and some reelectionist senators may want his endorsement. Its to late to make an impact and is a heavy political burden on him due to American finance anti China propaganda. He choose and pick his battle ,with Marcos overwhelming victory and an impending oil crisis, with the goodwill generated by the incoming administration, this is the time to make a move and finalized an agreement.thanks Ansy for your response, so there was no formal agreement nor treaty as such between the 2 countries.
then it seems a reasonable and practical political maneuver by Duterte.
@tphuang Sir in this geopolitical game, you need to gamble and sometimes giving something is to received something. What is China strategic objective? We all know the answer and it's succeeding, the oil for me is insignificant what's important is w/o China participation nobody will be able to extract those oils and will remain untapped. That for me is power, so everybody need to be in China good grace....lolI don't understand the local Philippines politics, but I would say that China should be very careful with its dealing with regard to the new Marcos government. It cannot take the more pro-China admin for granted. Whatever agreement they eventually might strike cannot be looked upon domestically as terrible for Philippines. As long as China does not lose any of its existing rock/islands, I'm good with pretty much any type of agreement.
Then nothing change, you replace a imperialist with another one, China in her history never see the Philippines as a threat, if so we will be speaking Chinese as our national language....lol What China want is a peaceful neighborhood for her to grow and trade. Such proximity the Chinese don't need a military presence like the Americans do. So her economic strategy is the right one, as the region is starving for development.I would say this, if Philippines is willing to renege VFA and allow China to have access to a naval base (similar to what happens with Ream) in southern Philippines, I think China should be very generous and accommodating with settling its disputes with Philippines.
The naval base in Ream, Cambodia isn't even one for PLAN, at most it can have ships make some stops there for oil/supplies.Then nothing change, you replace a imperialist with another one, China in her history never see the Philippines as a threat, if so we will be speaking Chinese as our national language....lol What China want is a peaceful neighborhood for her to grow and trade. Such proximity the Chinese don't need a military presence like the Americans do. So her economic strategy is the right one, as the region is starving for development.
@Michaelsinodef bro port visit are allowed to any foreign ship as we're situated in a vital shipping lane, what we don't want is to use us as a staging point for military expedition or aggression against other country. The US had multiple bases around Asia, so why include us? It's by design to defend us or to recolonized us? the same question maybe ask to the Chinese, the Russian ,the Japanese and others. We had experience it all during the Korean War, Vietnam War, the Cold War , the Iraq War 1 and 2 and the WOT.The naval base in Ream, Cambodia isn't even one for PLAN, at most it can have ships make some stops there for oil/supplies.
And I do think China would want that to be possible one day for Philippine as well (no need for actual persistent/permanent basing), although right now would kind of be stepping on US toes, so probably better to wait.
(Also in general, I think as China gets deals where it can more easily visit and get supplies, we might also see more cooperation/training with friendly foreign navies, and they might also sometime go for a friendly visit and get a stop at a chinese port).
Fully agree with @ansy1968@Michaelsinodef bro port visit are allowed to any foreign ship as we're situated in a vital shipping lane, what we don't want is to use us as a staging point for military expedition or aggression against other country. The US had multiple bases around Asia, so why include us? It's by design to defend us or to recolonized us? the same question maybe ask to the Chinese, the Russian ,the Japanese and others. We had experience it all during the Korean War, Vietnam War, the Cold War , the Iraq War 1 and 2 and the WOT.