China's SCS Strategy Thread

[Equation]

A rational review of my take on the CPC shows far more balance for and against the Communist Party and its authoritarian governance than you've thus far displayed, and unlike fanbois like you, I don't cry a river whenever someone points out problems with Chinese Communist Party or with the US government. I'm willing to see good/bad/black/white/grey in various governments.

No you don't. You don't display the same "balance" view on religious institutions or any western government that's for sure. Haters such as yourself just couldn't accept the changing world around them and that the CPC is a big part for that reason and optimism. You couldn't see that the CPC has done a tremendous job at elevating hundreds of millions of people out of poverty, a feat that has not been seen in mankind's history before or by any other form of government or "God" out there.

 

[Blackstone]

No you don't. You don't display the same "balance" view on religious institutions or any western government that's for sure. Haters such as yourself just couldn't accept the changing world around them and that the CPC is a big part for that reason and optimism. You couldn't see that the CPC has done a tremendous job at elevating hundreds of millions of people out of poverty, a feat that has not been seen in mankind's history before or by any other form of government or "God" out there.

I previously offered to put the case of between you and I, who's more balanced in the totality of SDF postings, and I will make the same offer again. Here are the conditions:

1. My claim is from all our postings here on SDF, I'm much more balanced than you. I'll let you choose if that's judged from all our postings, or just all the posts in the last 12 months. If that's too long for your taste, I'll go for 6 months. And if 2016 was a bad year for you, then I'll agree to only posts since January 1, 2017.
   
2. By "balance," I mean there ratio of positive vs. negative posts, and by "much more," I mean >=20%
3. I will accept any official SDF mod you care to name as judge; his or her word is final.
4. If you want someone other than SDF mod, I will accept anyone from the list below that you could convince to judge fairly and impartially. Kindly note some of them are at times critical of my posts. Why am I willing to accept them? Because whatever their views, I feel they can make rational and relatively unbiased rulings, in spite of our differences
   
   1. PLAWolf
   2. Air Force Brat
   3. Skywatcher
   4. Asif Iqbal
      
   5. Samurai Blue
   6. Advill
   7. Antiterror13
   8. Blitzo
   9. MastaKhan
   10. Forbin
   11. Miragedriver
   12. Vesicles
5. If I lose, meaning you're judged to be more balanced in SDF posts, then I will acknowledge in publicly and stop posting for the rest of the year. I could read the forum, but can't post.
6. If you lose, meaning you're judged to be less balanced in SDF posts, then you will acknowledge it publicly and stop post for one month. Yes, only 30 days to my rest of the year. You could still read SDF, just can't post.

So, how about it, Equation, do you care to walk your talk?

 

[PiSigma]

I previously offered to put the case of between you and I, who's more balanced in the totality of SDF postings, and I will make the same offer again. Here are the conditions:

1. My claim is from all our postings here on SDF, I'm much more balanced than you. I'll let you choose if that's judged from all our postings, or just all the posts in the last 12 months. If that's too long for your taste, I'll go for 6 months. And if 2016 was a bad year for you, then I'll agree to only posts since January 1, 2017.
   
2. By "balance," I mean there ratio of positive vs. negative posts, and by "much more," I mean >=20%
3. I will accept any official SDF mod you care to name as judge; his or her word is final.
4. If you want someone other than SDF mod, I will accept anyone from the list below that you could convince to judge fairly and impartially. Kindly note some of them are at times critical of my posts. Why am I willing to accept them? Because whatever their views, I feel they can make rational and relatively unbiased rulings, in spite of our differences
   1. PLAWolf
   2. Air Force Brat
   3. Skywatcher
   4. Asif Iqbal
      
   5. Samurai Blue
   6. Advill
   7. Antiterror13
   8. Blitzo
   9. MastaKhan
   10. Forbin
   11. Miragedriver
   12. Vesicles
5. If I lose, meaning you're judged to be more balanced in SDF posts, then I will acknowledge in publicly and stop posting for the rest of the year. I could read the forum, but can't post.
6. If you lose, meaning you're judged to be less balanced in SDF posts, then you will acknowledge it publicly and stop post for one month. Yes, only 30 days to my rest of the year. You could still read SDF, just can't post.

So, how about it, Equation, do you care to walk your talk?

Why are you guys even arguing on "neutrality"? The whole point of a forum is to talk about your opinion, and not just trying to win an argument.
Try getting back on topic.

 

[Blackstone]

Why are you guys even arguing on "neutrality"? The whole point of a forum is to talk about your opinion, and not just trying to win an argument.
Try getting back on topic.

Equation accused me of lacking balance, and I responded in kind. I note your disapproval.

 

[Yvrch]

A rational review of my take on the CPC shows far more balance for and against the Communist Party and its authoritarian governance than you've thus far displayed, and unlike fanbois like you, I don't cry a river whenever someone points out problems with Chinese Communist Party or with the US government. I'm willing to see good/bad/black/white/grey in various governments.

First off, if you are calling someone else a fanbois, then an annoying dick and a thoughtless retard are in good taste to make it a level playing field.

Second off, personally speaking, I believe nothing is above mockery, provided everyone understood what is the subject matter at hand and can follow it with ease within the specific thread's discussion stream. Throwing something else entirely separate from what is at hand is just being a dick. Even worse, diverting the whole thought stream towards your hatred of anything related to current Chinese political system far out of left field is as thoughtless as it can get.

This entire thread is not about governance or governments. Crying or not,black or white is not what this thread is all about.

Do you think any of us here, both pro and anti camps, has even the slightest amount of power or control over any of Chinese government's decisions, action, inaction or otherwise how they conduct their business? If something is out of one's control, one cannot take responsibility for it, or take blame for the consequences.

What exactly is your point bringing this CPC hatred to derail the thread and use it as a weight to stop the other guy as if he is personally responsible for conduct of CPC? You even attempt to have an aura of dignity in saying so while in actuality you are thoughtless ,ineffectual, weak and shallow in character when one thinks through the entire saga, a repeating one at that.

You show up in a cancer ward and yell out several times " I'm cancer free, I don't have it" won't allow you to cure cancer.

I'm not entirely sure if what we are seeing is an act of a tactful comedian or a thoughtless retard as there is a fine line between the two, only difference is we laugh with the former and laugh at the latter.

 

[Blackstone]

First off, if you are calling someone else a fanbois, then an annoying dick and a thoughtless retard are in good taste to make it a level playing field.

Second off, personally speaking, I believe nothing is above mockery, provided everyone understood what is the subject matter at hand and can follow it with ease within the specific thread's discussion stream. Throwing something else entirely separate from what is at hand is just being a dick. Even worse, diverting the whole thought stream towards your hatred of anything related to current Chinese political system far out of left field is as thoughtless as it can get.

This entire thread is not about governance or governments. Crying or not,black or white is not what this thread is all about.

Do you think any of us here, both pro and anti camps, has even the slightest amount of power or control over any of Chinese government's decisions, action, inaction or otherwise how they conduct their business? If something is out of one's control, one cannot take responsibility for it, or take blame for the consequences.

What exactly is your point bringing this CPC hatred to derail the thread and use it as a weight to stop the other guy as if he is personally responsible for conduct of CPC? You even attempt to have an aura of dignity in saying so while in actuality you are thoughtless ,ineffectual, weak and shallow in character when one thinks through the entire saga, a repeating one at that.

You show up in a cancer ward and yell out several times " I'm cancer free, I don't have it" won't allow you to cure cancer.

I'm not entirely sure if what we are seeing is an act of a tactful comedian or a thoughtless retard as there is a fine line between the two, only difference is we laugh with the former and laugh at the latter.

Love your post, it's amusing. Might want to work on your mockery, it's more effective when it's done with less ad hominid. You want a touch of it, but understated. Otherwise, you're just an average mocker and not a refined one. Do it again, but with more feelings.

 

[Equation]

I previously offered to put the case of between you and I, who's more balanced in the totality of SDF postings, and I will make the same offer again. Here are the conditions:

1. My claim is from all our postings here on SDF, I'm much more balanced than you. I'll let you choose if that's judged from all our postings, or just all the posts in the last 12 months. If that's too long for your taste, I'll go for 6 months. And if 2016 was a bad year for you, then I'll agree to only posts since January 1, 2017.
   
2. By "balance," I mean there ratio of positive vs. negative posts, and by "much more," I mean >=20%
3. I will accept any official SDF mod you care to name as judge; his or her word is final.
4. If you want someone other than SDF mod, I will accept anyone from the list below that you could convince to judge fairly and impartially. Kindly note some of them are at times critical of my posts. Why am I willing to accept them? Because whatever their views, I feel they can make rational and relatively unbiased rulings, in spite of our differences
   1. PLAWolf
   2. Air Force Brat
   3. Skywatcher
   4. Asif Iqbal
      
   5. Samurai Blue
   6. Advill
   7. Antiterror13
   8. Blitzo
   9. MastaKhan
   10. Forbin
   11. Miragedriver
   12. Vesicles
5. If I lose, meaning you're judged to be more balanced in SDF posts, then I will acknowledge in publicly and stop posting for the rest of the year. I could read the forum, but can't post.
6. If you lose, meaning you're judged to be less balanced in SDF posts, then you will acknowledge it publicly and stop post for one month. Yes, only 30 days to my rest of the year. You could still read SDF, just can't post.

So, how about it, Equation, do you care to walk your talk?

Your offer is a joke and your argument has no substance. You still have never initiated any arguments that reflects negatively towards your favorite religious institution, Trump, Tea Party, or the corrupt Taiwan government in ANY subject matter here on SDF and perhaps never will either. But when it comes to the PRC and CPC government anybody proposing a different perspective that may seems positive are called out by you as a fan bois. That is NOT "balance" in any shape or form point of view.

 

[Blackstone]

Your offer is a joke and your argument has no substance. You still have never initiated any arguments that reflects negatively towards your favorite religious institution, Trump, Tea Party, or the corrupt Taiwan government in ANY subject matter here on SDF and perhaps never will either. But when it comes to the PRC and CPC government anybody proposing a different perspective that may seems positive are called out by you as a fan bois. That is NOT "balance" in any shape or form point of view.

Looks like you're sure of your conviction, so take up my offer and you stand to gain my banishment from SDF for the rest of the year. How about it, Equation?

 

[Equation]

Looks like you're sure of your conviction, so take up my offer and you stand to gain my banishment from SDF for the rest of the year. How about it, Equation?

Looks like you are afraid of the facts and are trying to avoid any opposing point of view. Sorry but SDF does not revolves around on your silly childish games that has no substance. People such as yourself are always avoiding history because they are not good at it arguing against it.

 

[Blackstone]

Looks like you are afraid of the facts and are trying to avoid any opposing point of view. Sorry but SDF does not revolves around on your silly childish games that has no substance. People such as yourself are always avoiding history because they are not good at it arguing against it.

So Equation, let's put our thesis and antithesis to the test. Take me up on my offer in post 4332 and test your convictions before an impartial arbiter.