I think you should let it rest now panda, All of us that have actually been in army have given their somewhat united obinion about this weapon, its not practically usefull. Similar systems like LAWs and disposable LAWs are far better suited for infantry emergy AT work and even those are, based on expereince hard to aim and shoot exspecially to moving targets. And those have superior handeling capabilities.
The accuracy of this thing vs. normal LAWs quite close to the relatively accuracy differences between rifle and pistol. The ergonomics used for the chinese weapons are similar to pistol shooting (hand stretched to its longest reach position and held stable) and LAWs have somewhat rifleish ergonomics (the weapon can be supported to your body) I doesen't need military backround to figure out wich one is sharper...
So panda, If you don't have any sudden rise of expereince with infantry AT weapons, you stop your silly counter-arguing based on nothing else than nationality issues. Understood?
The accuracy of this thing vs. normal LAWs quite close to the relatively accuracy differences between rifle and pistol. The ergonomics used for the chinese weapons are similar to pistol shooting (hand stretched to its longest reach position and held stable) and LAWs have somewhat rifleish ergonomics (the weapon can be supported to your body) I doesen't need military backround to figure out wich one is sharper...
So panda, If you don't have any sudden rise of expereince with infantry AT weapons, you stop your silly counter-arguing based on nothing else than nationality issues. Understood?