Brumby
Major
You guys are so blind by idealism that you don't even see you are behaving exactly like US. That is what make China IR incoherent.
I don't think it is a case of being incoherent - just hypocrisy coupled with arrogance.
You guys are so blind by idealism that you don't even see you are behaving exactly like US. That is what make China IR incoherent.
Of course I accept it. America should try to defend its global crown, and China should try to take it. I don't fault them for wanting to keep that title and I don't fault them for trying to do their best. You're the one complaining and whining here. I've got no complaints, simply said if they want to do unfair things, we can do it too.
I thought you said that the coherent strategy is to compete, and now that you see China is and has always been competing at the highest, it's somehow still incoherent for other reasons all the same? LOL Now that's what I call incoherent!
I don't think it is a case of being incoherent - just hypocrisy coupled with arrogance.
Now that would be like the US but that is somewhere China does not accompany it.I don't think it is a case of being incoherent - just hypocrisy coupled with arrogance.
That's fine with me.I was the one saying China should adopt realism in IR/PR not trying to projet itself like a good guy.
And you focused on the wrong part again. I said unfair to show that since the US stepped out of the rules of global trade and decency, China can follow, NOT that the US needs to adhere to them. I believe in all out competition.It is you who were talking about unfairness and complaining and whining about everything.
Yeah, I don't get incoherent arguments.You still don't get it.
In typical IR, there is a political process leading to any outcome. The differing feature between the US and China is in the manner of political process. The US like any democratic entity adopts a consultative and open process. In contrast, China being a totalitarian regime typically adopts an opaqueness and nebulous approach. This contrast can be seen between the US/China and China/Australia trade war which is on display. Whilst China complains that the US is acting like a bully, China itself is acting just like one with Australia except the difference between the two trade wars is with the political process adopted. China simply decides it want to punish Australia through unilateral action. No initial consultation, refuses to discuss it and hide behind some administrative excuses. That is arrogance and hypocritical in behavior.Yes it is, but arrogance does not exclude being coherent, specially in IR. US is very arrogant.
IMO it is a mindset issue. In totalitarian states, the attitude is "do what I say and not what I do". In other words, it is so used to having its way with no accountability for its actions it just treat others with lesser consideration As China has said before "China is a big country and the rest is .....".China is new to all that, so they are still learning to be a great power...
Purely out of sadistic pleasure. If anyone crosses China, it'll break their bones just for the fun of it.Australia already banned Huawei, now you are punishing for what goal?
Indeed.Sometimes China behave exactly like US.
Oh, yes, you most certainly do.You don't punish just because you can.
If Australia were as important a trading partner to China as China is to the US, then China would have no choice but to negotiate like the US too. It seems you're getting awfully worked up about China simply not wanting to do the same amount of business with you anymore. That's China's sovereign decision, right? You're not trying to bully China into wasting its time talking to you on matters of its own sovereign choice, are you? That's just harassment! Now you're trying to say that because someone tells you that he's made up his mind and has better things to do than to keep chatting with you, he's totalitarian, hypocritical, opaque, and nebulous? LOL Get at grip!In typical IR, there is a political process leading to any outcome. The differing feature between the US and China is in the manner of political process. The US like any democratic entity adopts a consultative and open process. In contrast, China being a totalitarian regime typically adopts an opaqueness and nebulous approach. This contrast can be seen between the US/China and China/Australia trade war which is on display. Whilst China complains that the US is acting like a bully, China itself is acting just like one with Australia except the difference between the two trade wars is with the political process adopted. China simply decides it want to punish Australia through unilateral action. No initial consultation, refuses to discuss it and hide behind some administrative excuses. That is arrogance and hypocritical in behavior.
Sounds like you're calling the US a totalitarian state, which would be accurate seeing how they handle protesters recently. The US tries to force North Korea/Iran to disarm while arming itself just because it's used to having its way.IMO it is a mindset issue. In totalitarian states, the attitude is "do what I say and not what I do". In other words, it is so used to having its way with no accountability for its actions it just treat others with lesser consideration As China has said before "China is a big country and the rest is .....".
Australia already banned Huawei, now you are punishing for what goal? Do you think Australia will change because of your punishment?
US have put many sanction on NK to abandon nuclear weapon, but NK is not going to abandon those weapon
Sometimes China behave exactly like US. You don't punish just because you can.
No, I don't. That's making your complaint known as the first step against an offense. Whether or not more steps are taken depend on your leverage and the seriousness of the offense. Once again, if you consider that incoherent, then what would you do instead that is more "coherent"?