China need a new geopolitical Doctrine ?

Status
Not open for further replies.

escobar

Brigadier
Of course I accept it. America should try to defend its global crown, and China should try to take it. I don't fault them for wanting to keep that title and I don't fault them for trying to do their best. You're the one complaining and whining here. I've got no complaints, simply said if they want to do unfair things, we can do it too.

You are very very funny. At least you are not fully hypocritical

I was the one saying China should adopt realism in IR/PR not trying to projet itself like a good guy. It is you who were talking about unfairness and complaining and whining about everything.

I thought you said that the coherent strategy is to compete, and now that you see China is and has always been competing at the highest, it's somehow still incoherent for other reasons all the same? LOL Now that's what I call incoherent!

You still don't get it.
 

escobar

Brigadier
I don't think it is a case of being incoherent - just hypocrisy coupled with arrogance.

Yes it is, but arrogance does not exclude being coherent, specially in IR. US is very arrogant.

China is new to all that, so they are still learning to be a great power...
 

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
I don't think it is a case of being incoherent - just hypocrisy coupled with arrogance.
Now that would be like the US but that is somewhere China does not accompany it.
I was the one saying China should adopt realism in IR/PR not trying to projet itself like a good guy.
That's fine with me.
It is you who were talking about unfairness and complaining and whining about everything.
And you focused on the wrong part again. I said unfair to show that since the US stepped out of the rules of global trade and decency, China can follow, NOT that the US needs to adhere to them. I believe in all out competition.
You still don't get it.
Yeah, I don't get incoherent arguments.
 

Brumby

Major
Yes it is, but arrogance does not exclude being coherent, specially in IR. US is very arrogant.
In typical IR, there is a political process leading to any outcome. The differing feature between the US and China is in the manner of political process. The US like any democratic entity adopts a consultative and open process. In contrast, China being a totalitarian regime typically adopts an opaqueness and nebulous approach. This contrast can be seen between the US/China and China/Australia trade war which is on display. Whilst China complains that the US is acting like a bully, China itself is acting just like one with Australia except the difference between the two trade wars is with the political process adopted. China simply decides it want to punish Australia through unilateral action. No initial consultation, refuses to discuss it and hide behind some administrative excuses. That is arrogance and hypocritical in behavior.

China is new to all that, so they are still learning to be a great power...
IMO it is a mindset issue. In totalitarian states, the attitude is "do what I say and not what I do". In other words, it is so used to having its way with no accountability for its actions it just treat others with lesser consideration As China has said before "China is a big country and the rest is .....".
 

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
In typical IR, there is a political process leading to any outcome. The differing feature between the US and China is in the manner of political process. The US like any democratic entity adopts a consultative and open process. In contrast, China being a totalitarian regime typically adopts an opaqueness and nebulous approach. This contrast can be seen between the US/China and China/Australia trade war which is on display. Whilst China complains that the US is acting like a bully, China itself is acting just like one with Australia except the difference between the two trade wars is with the political process adopted. China simply decides it want to punish Australia through unilateral action. No initial consultation, refuses to discuss it and hide behind some administrative excuses. That is arrogance and hypocritical in behavior.
If Australia were as important a trading partner to China as China is to the US, then China would have no choice but to negotiate like the US too. It seems you're getting awfully worked up about China simply not wanting to do the same amount of business with you anymore. That's China's sovereign decision, right? You're not trying to bully China into wasting its time talking to you on matters of its own sovereign choice, are you? That's just harassment! Now you're trying to say that because someone tells you that he's made up his mind and has better things to do than to keep chatting with you, he's totalitarian, hypocritical, opaque, and nebulous? LOL Get at grip!

IMO it is a mindset issue. In totalitarian states, the attitude is "do what I say and not what I do". In other words, it is so used to having its way with no accountability for its actions it just treat others with lesser consideration As China has said before "China is a big country and the rest is .....".
Sounds like you're calling the US a totalitarian state, which would be accurate seeing how they handle protesters recently. The US tries to force North Korea/Iran to disarm while arming itself just because it's used to having its way.
 

AndrewS

Brigadier
Registered Member
Australia already banned Huawei, now you are punishing for what goal? Do you think Australia will change because of your punishment?
US have put many sanction on NK to abandon nuclear weapon, but NK is not going to abandon those weapon
Sometimes China behave exactly like US. You don't punish just because you can.

I agree that China punishing Australia won't change Australia's Huawei decision.

But it will be an object lesson for the next time Australia thinks about doing something similar. And that lesson will be noted elsewhere in the world.

That is the stick, but China also has much larger economic carrots as well for countries that do play ball.
 

gadgetcool5

Senior Member
Registered Member
No, I don't. That's making your complaint known as the first step against an offense. Whether or not more steps are taken depend on your leverage and the seriousness of the offense. Once again, if you consider that incoherent, then what would you do instead that is more "coherent"?

Maybe step back and see why these countries are doing this and the larger context. Realize that China's threats are not going to change the decision of these countries, so all the threats will do is further damage ties, and further reveal China's impotence.

Then work to improve China's relations with the Anglo countries slowly so that although Huawei is banned, the situation for other Chinese people & companies can be marginally improved gradually & over time.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top