Why is Bill Gertz the only one who reported this? Lol.df-45/51 seems a massive and real; it got 7x650kt yield (7 warheads each with 650 thousand tons of TNT equivalent).
Sorry, if I wrote this incorrectly. This is my first comment.
The Chinese representatives offered reassurances after their U.S. interlocutors raised concerns that China might use, or threaten to use, nuclear weapons if it faced defeat in a conflict over Taiwan. Beijing views the democratically governed island as its territory, a claim rejected by the government in Taipei.
"They told the U.S. side that they were absolutely convinced that they are able to prevail in a conventional fight over Taiwan without using nuclear weapons," said scholar David Santoro, the U.S. organiser of the Track Two talks, the details of which are being reported by Reuters for the first time.
A rather funny exchange .
US: I'm worried that you'll use nukes if you lose.
China: Don't worry, I won't lose.
I got a bunch ofI think it's more likely that if China won conventionally, that the US would go apeshit and start launching nukes.
That assumes they still retain their sanity at that point and don't want to embrace mutual destruction just out of spite/racism/hubris. They'll convince themselves that Chinese missiles are full of water and so obviously a first strike will succeed.I got a bunch of1620 wheelers that say different.
gojo lost though, didn't he?Literally:
"Would you lose?"
"Nah I'd win"
There is an actual report about nuclear use in this specific case. I don't really recommend reading it as it is quite biased but here it is anyway.I think it's more likely that if China won conventionally, that the US would go apeshit and start launching nukes.
No thanks. I have no interest in reading a bloated propaganda document. If you know the relevant line, just paraphrase them for us.There is an actual report about nuclear use in this specific case. I don't really recommend reading it as it is quite biased but here it is anyway.