China ICBM/SLBM, nuclear arms thread

T

tokenanalyst

Brigadier
Registered Member
ACuriousPLAFan said:
China declines to meet with US on nuclear arms control, US official says

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

That's right. Why should China keeps engaging with the US in nuclear arms control when China is still yet to be an equivalent to the US in terms of nuclear weapon fielding and delivery capabilities?

In fact - Until either the US voluntarily reduces her own nuclear arsenal in terms of (whichever of the two is lower) the number of nuclear warheads or the cumulative yield in megatonnage to match that of China - OR let China increases her own nuclear arsenal in terms of (whichever of the two is higher) the number of warheads or the cumulative yield in megatonnage to match that of the US - Then China shouldn't bother with any talks that serve to stifle her own MAD capabilities and/or putting her own MAD capabilities in a decisive disadvantage situation to the US.
Click to expand...
ACuriousPLAFan said:
SomeoneIsGettingReallyAnxious.jpg

View attachment 129245

So if the "when-you-come-down-to-our-level-then-we-will-talk" excuse is getting old, then it is only natural that the "when-we-get-up-to-your-level-then-we-will-talk" reasoning becomes the only viable option, right? Right?
Click to expand...
1715804508076.png

What happen? There is nothing to fear about water filled missiles and also the silo doors won't even open. What is even there to negotiate? Fearing water filled missiles is like fearing an water pistol.
1715804540496.png
 
R

Ringsword

Junior Member
Registered Member
This muck/feces-smearing is deliberate and part of the 500 million USD set aside to find/make up negative /bad/outright garbage to deride and embarrass China in all respects-it's simple psyops and USA /WEST has basically become Indians in spewing racism tinged fake news.Become stronger in all respects China-ignore this sh*t.
 
Kalec

Kalec

Junior Member
Registered Member
China to have an ICBM or long range IRBM test, likely for development purpose from Taiyuan tomorrow.

1716223032624.jpg


Notam info:
A1261/24 NOTAMN
Q) ZXXX/QRDCA/IV/BO/W/000/999/3856N10854E023
A) ZLHW ZBPE B) 2405221350 C) 2405221447
E) A TEMPORARY DANGER AREA ESTABLISHED BOUNDED BY: N3904E10827-N3903E10923-N3849E10923-N3850E10826, BACK TO START. VERTICAL LIMITS:SFC-UNL.
F) SFC G) UNL

A1262/24 NOTAMN Q) ZXXX/QRDCA/IV/BO/W/000/999/3752N08847E073
A) ZLHW ZWUQ B) 2405221352 C) 2405221453
E) A TEMPORARY DANGER AREA ESTABLISHED BOUNDED BY: N3751E08715-N3817E09014-N3754E09019-N3727E08721, BACK TO START. VERTICAL LIMITS:SFC-UNL.
F) SFC G) UNL
Click to expand...
 
A

ACuriousPLAFan

Brigadier
Registered Member
SIPRI 2024 just came out.

Is SIRPI high on something?

Now that SIPRI says that China has 500 nuclear warheads - But only 24 of them are deployed? WTAF?

SIPRI also claimed that China will have more ICBMs than either the US or Russia by 2030.

006Rm4MAgy1hqs6hyi8okj30qs0feah1.jpg
006Rm4MAgy1hqs670zn6kj30lz0hrqdo.jpg

(Also didn't those DC blobs claimed that Chinese missiles are filled with water? So why bother anyway?)
 
Last edited:
I

Index

Senior Member
Registered Member
ACuriousPLAFan said:
SIPRI 2024 just came out.

Is SIRPI high on something?

Now that SIPRI says that China has 500 nuclear warheads - But only 24 of them are deployed? WTAF?

SIPRI also claimed that China will have more ICBMs than either the US or Russia by 2030.

View attachment 131174
View attachment 131175

(Also didn't those DC blobs claimed that Chinese missiles are filled with water? So why bother anyway?)
Click to expand...
As I'm not that familiar with them, what is their agenda anyways?

I doubt they are purposefully trying to obfuscate China's nuclear arsenal to aid the PLA. Is it just a low quality report putting in random placeholder numbers for info they don't have?
 
I

ismellcopium

Junior Member
Registered Member
ACuriousPLAFan said:
SIPRI 2024 just came out.

Is SIRPI high on something?

Now that SIPRI says that China has 500 nuclear warheads - But only 24 of them are deployed? WTAF?

SIPRI also claimed that China will have more ICBMs than either the US or Russia by 2030.

View attachment 131174
View attachment 131175

(Also didn't those DC blobs claimed that Chinese missiles are filled with water? So why bother anyway?)
Click to expand...
Why even post the worthless OSINTer regurgitation?

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Is it known if the size estimates here, especially the increase in length of 31AG vs A, are accurate?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top