If WS-10A has such lousy lifespan, I think WS-10A would not have won the national project award in 2008 and PLA will never accept it.
If J-10 needed to be fitted with Russian engine and export, PLA will not have held an open exhibition in February this year to showcase J-10 to the world and aggressively promoted it...
And finally, CCTV will not broadcast the documentary about the success of WS-10A recently if it really is so problematic and cannot be mass produced.
PLA only be open about things that work well,do well.
Just like the first shenzhou launch in 2003. They never even live telecast it. It only when they are very confident and works well. Then they will be open about it. The 2005 second launch was widely documented and live telecast given it.
Lastly, this russian military report is bullsh*t...
WS-10 is the one with the short life time problems and I believe that WS-10A is a fully capable engine (in fact the only engines used on J-11Bs are WS-10As).