If yes, what have been done?
Anyone else thinks that the J-16 will fulfill the fighter-interceptor-bomber role in PLAAF? So far it is the only fighter confirmed to carry long-range AA missiles.
Also, it appears that China will go for a high-lo combination of J-20/J-16 instead of J-20/FC-31 in the near future. What do you guys think of the combination?
J-20/J-16 hi-lo? Thinks its more like J-20/J-10C for the moment and in the future J-20/J-XX(2) in terms of hi-lo. J-16/J-16D on the other hand covers several specialized roles as you pointed out (All the roles performed by the Su-30MKK, JH-7A and even the MiG-31)
Why would J-16 AESA be superior to J-20? The only reason I can think of is maybe because J-20 needs LPI while J-16 can blast radar all-out?Pretty sure the J-20/J-16 will constitute the hi-lo combination since the J-10C probably doesn't have the necessary range for offensive warfare in the Eastern and South-Eastern theater.
There is some speculation that the AESA used on the J-16 might even be superior to that of the J-20 in terms of range and resolution. That, coupled with heavier load capacity, probably contributed to the J-16's use as a potential AWAC/Tanker killer.