...The older J-11 may have been upgraded with N001VE.
Yepp ... and that's what I meant with MLU !
...The older J-11 may have been upgraded with N001VE.
Su-30MK2 Radar - Tikhomirov NIIP N001VEP
Same as above plus R-77 for A-to-A. N001VEP has additional A-to-G modes allowing the usage of Kh-31A while MKK can only use Kh-31P.
Good conversation but allow me to ask,
Su-30MMK armed only with Kh-31P anti-radar OK but YJ-91 also and only anti radar variant i think ?
A thing important, normaly anti-ships missiles equip mainly Naval Aviation fighters, in France and USA, it is or different for countries which don't have a Naval Aviation equiped with fighters a part have but in general small stocks.
And Su-30MK2 can be armed with Kh-31P and A anti-ship him, sea skimming, supersonic but have a enough small warhead 90 kg in more also YJ-91 which is better ( speed, more big warhead ) the 2 variants ?
How to visually recognize the 2 variants for the 2 missiles, possible ?
Looks like she's flying wit WS-10s, or is it my eyes playing tricks on me?Yes ... since it is a J-16 !!!!
Looks like she's flying wit WS-10s, or is it my eyes playing tricks on me?
Looks like she's flying wit WS-10s, or is it my eyes playing tricks on me?
except J-15sAs a rule, up till now, all SAC built land based flankers since about 2009 are powered by WS-10s, and it doesn't seem like it is going to change.
That goes for J-11B/H, J-11BS/H, J-11D, J-16, J-16D.
I don't know why the testing of the J-16s has already taken such a long time. It is just a knockoff of Su-30MKK with more advanced radar and electronics. This is clearly a testing aircraft with no PLAAF serial number on the tail. Maybe my question should be why did the J-16 took much longer than the J-15s in R&D and fly testing, when both are copies of Su-30s and Su-33s?No black nose cone?
(1441 x 960)