China Ballistic Missiles and Nuclear Arms Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
There's this country called, "Russia".
Oh, is there? And there's this country called, "USA." So you understand why China must build nukes, right?
And again, it's not the US who just got caught building 400 missile silos. Just sayin'.
Just sayin' what? That in your imaginary world of special American privilege, that the US has a unique country invasion license that Russia doesn't and the right to have more nukes than China?
 

AssassinsMace

Lieutenant General
Do you have a source on that? Even now, no specific numbers have ever been decided upon.



There's this country called, "Russia". And again, it's not the US who just got caught building 400 missile silos. Just sayin'.

It doesn't matter. It's Trump. He thinks might is right and he wanted more nukes. Trump loves Russia so it's not a factor in his mind hence why he targeted China. It doesn't matter how many silos. The US still has more nukes. China has the right to more nukes because the US brags how many military allies it has meaning more targets for China to counter.
 

sferrin

Junior Member
Registered Member
It doesn't matter. It's Trump. He thinks might is right and he wanted more nukes.

So, "no source required because reasons"? Should I be surprised?

Trump loves Russia so it's not a factor in his mind hence why he targeted China. It doesn't matter how many silos. The US still has more nukes. China has the right to more nukes because the US brags how many military allies it has meaning more targets for China to counter.

Trump doesn't "love" Russia. If he did he wouldn't have dropped so many sanctions on them. Also, nobody is saying what anybody has a "right" to. Just pointing out that the US has no interest in nuking anybody. But the US has Russia and China to "counter" so there ya go. Cold War 2.
 

AssassinsMace

Lieutenant General
So, "no source required because reasons"? Should I be surprised?



Trump doesn't "love" Russia. If he did he wouldn't have dropped so many sanctions on them. Also, nobody is saying what anybody has a "right" to. Just pointing out that the US has no interest in nuking anybody. But the US has Russia and China to "counter" so there ya go. Cold War 2.
Why should I bother? Every knows because it was on the news. The people who accuse fake news on anything they don't like to see are going to believe if given the facts...?
 

clockwork

Junior Member
Registered Member
Oh, is there? And there's this country called, "USA." So you understand why China must build nukes, right?

Just sayin' what? That in your imaginary world of special American privilege, that the US has a unique country invasion license that Russia doesn't and the right to have more nukes than China?
Peak irony & projection lulw. It's 300 silos, the US is the one with exactly 400.
And he new seems to indicate that the new JL-3 SLBM is already on the 6 Jin-class SSBNs
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. Still sus. Idk I hope it's true though. Honestly I feel weird trusting him on things cuz he often sounds like a broken record propagandist. The stuff he repeats incessantly about how China can escalate anytime anywhere with any instrument of national power etc. is plain bizarre.

Anyone figure there still could be more silos out there undiscovered? I was hoping for more after the revelations last year, but seems unlikely after this much time, especially not a larger grouping like the first 2.
 

ougoah

Brigadier
Registered Member

That's a whole loop around earth.

40,000km would be either reference to the longest latitudinal distance - equatorial, so essentially saying they tracked it flying one entire loop around the earth. Or the distance covered is 40,000km which happens to be the equatorial distance. If choosing a higher latitude (where China is), the distance would be roughly 20,000km to 30,000km distance, potentially circling twice assuming the 40,000km is referring to actual observed distance flown. This is probably not the case and the 40,000km was in reference to equatorial distance and making the point that it was a round the earth flight.

China flying a hypersonic aircraft within the atmosphere (said by both US and China that this was within the atmosphere which is hyper impressive) may have required some NOTAM and/or it would have to avoid certain places even if it is too high up to count as certain airspace or passing by way too fast. There is close to 0 chance of it hitting anything commercial even if there was an issue or failure. because the chances of such a thing hitting another is easily 1 in many billion.

Still the path would have curved and steered around sensitive areas... or maybe not. Either way this flight could have been through the poles to avoid issues, passing only a few nations which are neutral, friendly, or indifferent. The average speed is approaching Mach 20.
 

Broccoli

Senior Member

I wouldn't be surprised if they decided to field the DF-31A in the missile silos.

If China were to deploy DF-41s, theoretically that could be 3000 warheads which is excessive.

The US Minutemen missiles only have 1 warhead each, despite having the capacity to carry 3 warheads.

So the smaller (and cheaper) DF-31A could be used with just 1 warhead instead. That should give it the additional range to reach all of the USA. But some of the DF-31A could be fitted with more warheads at the expense of some range.

lol, I suggested last year that PLARF could put DF-31A's into those silos and people thought I was extremely wrong as DF-31A is a single warhead missile.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top