escobar
Brigadier
US already tested something similar: vintage racer
Very nice, BUT.US already tested something similar: vintage racer
The FT article IS technically very poor with lot of hype. Anyway vintage racer IS Just a UAVVery nice, BUT.
The same article goes on to say -
Pentagon officials have been increasingly public with their concerns about the July test. The hypersonic glide vehicle was propelled into space on an “orbital bombardment system” rocket that can fly over the South Pole, putting the weapon out of reach of US missile defence systems, which are focused on ballistic missile threats coming over the North Pole. The orbital bombardment system gives China more ways to hit US targets.
Moscow deployed a system called “fractional orbital bombardment system” during the cold war, but it was less advanced and did not carry a manoeuvrable hypersonic glide vehicle.
US officials are well aware that China is ahead of the Pentagon in hypersonic weapons. But the July 27 test showed that the People’s Liberation Army Rocket Force was making even faster progress than many had projected. That has been reinforced by Beijing successfully combining an orbital system with a hypersonic weapon that can shoot a missile.
So it is a FOBS + Hypersonic Vehicle + seperate Missile launch capability.
What more, the Hypersonic vehicle made complex maneuvering over significant ranges (But missed its target by 30 km).
Hope I don't sound fanboish here. But the article paints a far more complex system than Vintage racer project mentioned in that briefing transcript.
Reaching big speculation territory here as we don't know details of either the Vintage racer or the Chinese FOB hypersonic test
Indeed FT isn't exactly a military oriented piece. But other military enthusiast website has quoted FT ( with reservations). FT is the first to report it. The details carried in the FT article is " distinctly different" and the technology it mentions are unique enough to warrant attention. It's not often you come across an FOBs/ Hypersonic test allegation. Its different from a spying allegation or scandal expose.The FT article IS technically very poor with lot of hype. Anyway vintage racer IS Just a UAV
The FT article IS technically very poor with lot of hype. Anyway vintage racer IS Just a UAV
They are saying that it took place in the atmospherePentagon officials have been increasingly public with their concerns about the July test. The hypersonic glide vehicle was propelled into space on an “orbital bombardment system” rocket that can fly over the South Pole, putting the weapon out of reach of US missile defence systems, which are focused on ballistic missile threats coming over the North Pole. The orbital bombardment system gives China more ways to hit US targets.
- The single American nuclear submarine and aircraft carrier shipyard at Newport News.
Yes. It indeed took place in the atmosphere. The Hypersonic flight and the speculated release of missile happened in the atmosphere. The entire system was launched by a Long March rocket, right?They are saying that it took place in the atmosphere
Honestly, this whole thing is a mess. The article is garbage-level in terms of explaining clearly what happened
From the drive warzone ( good regarding US technological developments):A slow ass one from the look of it
Garbage article but it is interesting to notice that U.S. ability to track gliders is not as limited as the Pentagon claims.They are saying that it took place in the atmosphere
Honestly, this whole thing is a mess. The article is garbage-level in terms of explaining clearly what happened