China Ballistic Missiles and Nuclear Arms Thread

[sinophilia]

Are you so thick of not knowing what is strategic ambiguity go figure it out yourself You are adult and not in kinder garten!

You're the one that's so thick you couldn't even understand the nuance of my post It was pretty simple to read but I'll try to make it even simpler.

We ALL understand what strategic ambiguity is. Israel is a prime user of this type of strategy/policy, for completely different reasons.

So I'll ask you again, now that you understand we understand what it means: How does the policy of deliberate ambiguity on the Chinese nuclear arsenal help China?

Was that easier to understand?

 

[totenchan]

Are you so thick of not knowing what is strategic ambiguity go figure it out yourself You are adult and not in kinder garten! Put it this way you been in this forum and you witness chinese progress by leap and bound in conventional weapon Why when it come to nuclear stockpile they are stuck to 300 for 2 decades USE YOUR HEAD

Strategic ambiguity is an extremely basic term that has about as much relevance without context or explanation as your childish insults. Either explain why strategic ambiguity means that China somehow has a massive nuclear stockpile using a source or logic, or stop humiliating yourself.

 

[Hendrik_2000]

You're the one that's so thick you couldn't even understand the nuance of my post It was pretty simple to read but I'll try to make it even simpler.

We ALL understand what strategic ambiguity is. Israel is a prime user of this type of strategy/policy, for completely different reasons.

So I'll ask you again, now that you understand we understand what it means: How does the policy of deliberate ambiguity on the Chinese nuclear arsenal help China?

Was that easier to understand?

read the article before YOU OPEN YOUR MOUTH I AM NOT YOU BABY SITTER

 

[sinophilia]

read the article before YOU OPEN YOUR MOUTH I AM NOT YOU BABY SITTER

Your behavior makes you the one in need of a babysitter man. Very childish. Good luck.

 

[Hendrik_2000]

Strategic ambiguity is an extremely basic term that has about as much relevance without context or explanation as your childish insults. Either explain why strategic ambiguity means that China somehow has a massive nuclear stockpile using a source or logic, or stop humiliating yourself.

CAN'T YOU READ THE ARTICLE YOURSELF ARE YOU ILLETERATE?

 

[totenchan]

read the article before YOU OPEN YOUR MOUTH I AM NOT YOU BABY SITTER

Your source quotes the same "Chinese diplomat" that said that the number of Chinese warheads in in line with the French and British stockpiles. It says as much in the article. A self-own if I've ever seen one.

 

[sinophilia]

CAN'T YOU READ THE ARTICLE YOURSELF ARE YOU ILLETERATE?

It is the funniest irony when someone is writing in all caps, misspelling basic words like illiterate while accusing others of being illiterate.

Don't know what article you're talking about but the way you get infuriated because someone deconstructed your intellectual arrogance is more validating than winning any internet debate.

 

[Hendrik_2000]

It is the funniest irony when someone is writing in all caps, misspelling basic words like illiterate while accusing others of being illiterate.

Don't know what article you're talking about but the way you get infuriated because someone deconstructed your intellectual arrogance is more validating than winning any internet debate.

read this or do you need thick eye glass!

In an interview with Russian newspaper Kommersant – an English translation of which was published by Beijing on Thursday – Fu Cong, the head of the Chinese foreign ministry’s arms control department, defended China’s lack of transparency on the issue.
To ensure the effectiveness of its nuclear strategy, “it is important that China maintains a certain degree of ambiguity in terms of its numbers”, he said.
“Especially given the fact that the US, which regards China as its biggest competitor, is adopting such hostile policies towards China and maintains such a huge nuclear arsenal, of 6,000 [warheads].”

 

[totenchan]

read this or do you need thick eye glass!

In an interview with Russian newspaper Kommersant – an English translation of which was published by Beijing on Thursday – Fu Cong, the head of the Chinese foreign ministry’s arms control department, defended China’s lack of transparency on the issue.
To ensure the effectiveness of its nuclear strategy, “it is important that China maintains a certain degree of ambiguity in terms of its numbers”, he said.
“Especially given the fact that the US, which regards China as its biggest competitor, is adopting such hostile policies towards China and maintains such a huge nuclear arsenal, of 6,000 [warheads].”

And from the very same article: " Fu said in the Kommersant interview that in nuclear arsenal terms, China should be classified together with France and Britain. "

 

[sinophilia]

read this or do you need thick eye glass!

In an interview with Russian newspaper Kommersant – an English translation of which was published by Beijing on Thursday – Fu Cong, the head of the Chinese foreign ministry’s arms control department, defended China’s lack of transparency on the issue.
To ensure the effectiveness of its nuclear strategy, “it is important that China maintains a certain degree of ambiguity in terms of its numbers”, he said.
“Especially given the fact that the US, which regards China as its biggest competitor, is adopting such hostile policies towards China and maintains such a huge nuclear arsenal, of 6,000 [warheads].”

He is saying the same thing you are. That China is being ambiguous. He doesn't state with any strength WHY. Some generic statement about how hostile the US is and that's why they are being ambiguous. That's not in any way a serious explanation.

So I'm asking you, since you seem to know for a fact the reason for this strategic ambiguity is because China has so many more warheads than the Western world thinks, I am asking you what the point of this is?

Why? Do you know what why means? For what cause? The reason? On what account? The motive? Are there any more synonyms I can possibly use to get you to understand the simplicity of the initial question.

If China supposedly has 6,000 warheads, what is the point of pretending to have a couple hundred? Don't just say *garble garble* strategic ambiguity.