China Ballistic Missiles and Nuclear Arms Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

Air Force Brat

Brigadier
Super Moderator
Request for the mods: @siegecrossbow @Air Force Brat @Deino

It may be a good idea to have a separate thread for HGVs and HCMs at this point. (Maybe even one for each.) It may help keep things properly segmented. Because its hard to find specific info for each of these areas on this thread.

Sounds like a great idea Moshin, I'm sure Deino or Siege are much more conversant in the technology and could get us off to a better start?? Gents, what do you think of Moshin's idea?
 

Deino

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
Request for the mods: @siegecrossbow @Air Force Brat @Deino

It may be a good idea to have a separate thread for HGVs and HCMs at this point. (Maybe even one for each.) It may help keep things properly segmented. Because its hard to find specific info for each of these areas on this thread.

Indeed a good idea, but why don't you start such a tread on your own?
 

bajingan

Senior Member
According to this article if the start treaty finished and us were to put ballistic missile in japan, russia will be left with no choice but to provide China with ballistic missile and strategic bombers
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

chain smoker

New Member
Registered Member
According to this article if the start treaty finished and us were to put ballistic missile in japan, russia will be left with no choice but to provide China with ballistic missile and strategic bombers
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

I don't think Russia has anything to provide to China especially ballistic missiles which China already mastered.
 

bajingan

Senior Member
you mean miniaturization or weight reduction.
How about providing China with more weapons grade fissile materials in which China is reportedIy only have about 14 tons of HEU and 2.9 tons of plutonium. I don't if that possible or not, but the collapse of start treaty and the resumption of full on cold war might make it plausible
 

shanlung

Junior Member
Registered Member
Not that hoary numbers of 300 odd nukes for China.
And that Chinese dont have enough missiles and need to depend on Russia.
China got more than enough thermo nukes and more than enough missiles to make future tardigrades very happy.

How about this to refresh your memories, or for you all to mock and laugh at?

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top