We currently can't.Can we at least be sure that the 3 engines are all the same, and not 2 same, and 1 ramjet/scramjet?
That doesn't make sense since we know it has that very distinctive top engine intake.It seems that there is a lot of speculation of the CAC jet having three engines. I think it is only two engines with a bigger space in between than J-20. The nozels may be rectangular which are similar in shape as the central fairing. That gave the impression of a third engine.
A wide spaced twin engine setup is benificial for control (like flanker and Su-57), it becomes necessity for aircraft without canard/vertical stablizer/horizontal stablier.
Also it is absurd to think of a three engine setup, the aircraft is only slightly bigger than a J-20, it only looks big because of the wing-body merged design.
Ramjets only start working at speeds of mach 2-3 so the other two engines would have to get this plane to that high speed first. Not sure about that, however I saw a post somewhere sometime in the past that described a 3 engine system. The middle engine could produce a small amount of thrust but its main job was to generate electrical power in order to power the compressor fans of the other two main engines when cruising, in effect giving them a variable bypass ratio. So when the aircraft is taking off, all three engines are producing thrust, then when the plane reaches cruising altitiude, the middle engine cuts thrust and starts generating power to help turn the other two engines' fans which also reduce fuel intake simultaneously. This gets long range fuel efficient subsonic cruise. I think that was the gist of what I saw.Can we at least be sure that the 3 engines are all the same, and not 2 same, and 1 ramjet/scramjet?
Glad I went to bed literally 10 minutes before first post showed up, or I would have stayed up all night.
Now have to read through 30 pages