China got another gold in the World Athletics Championship.
Why do you make up lies about Chinese gov time and time again?
I just want to explain that it is very difficult to solve the cultural relics smuggling case.What the hell are you talking about? What does this shady Dutch collector has to do with South Koreans? Is the Dutch government involved in smuggling relics? He could have very well been the one to pay for the theft. There is no evidence of some imaginary art dealer paying for the theft or government connection in this case. Of course I can see why you get easily scammed by these rumors given your history.
Your source is Zhihu? That's even less trustworthy than your posts.
This is actually my memory error.Here is the history of cultural relics trading from 1950 to 1970. At that time, exporting cultural relics was a government act. But after entering the 1980s, folk smuggling began to become very serious.
I won't know what exactly is China's plan. But with all this rhetorics, there has to be some kind of dramatic response that China is planning to do.So we won't see this happen it seems
Seems the US military has already decided to not go that far: Breaking & World News! III NO DISCUSSION!!But ultimately, would the US military go that far just to please Pelosi's political stunt?
He obviously didn’t keep secret, which has nothing to do with what you said.I just want to explain that it is very difficult to solve the cultural relics smuggling case.
There are too many inexplicable reasons to hinder the return process of cultural relics.As the example I cited, even if there is a clear testimony pointing to a specific Korean buyer, there is no possibility of solving the case at all under the influence of nationalism and the identity and status of the person involved.
If the Dutch buyer strictly kept secret, it would be difficult for others to prove that he bought stolen goods.
China should really consider conducting more test flights of H-20 during Pelosi's expected visit to Taiwan to show the Pentagon and White House that Beijing means real business.
Yeah you memory isn’t that great and have a tendency to generalize. It‘s very specific in what can and can’t be exported. From your source though I have no way of validating the source.
This is actually my memory error.Here is the history of cultural relics trading from 1950 to 1970. At that time, exporting cultural relics was a government act. But after entering the 1980s, folk smuggling began to become very serious.
In the same year, the Cultural Heritage Bureau formulated the Standards for the Appraisal of Cultural Relics Export, which determined two boundaries of 1911 and 1795 (60 years of Qianlong) according to the situation of different cultural relics. Those cultural repetitive and of average value can be exported in an organized and planned way to obtain foreign exchange for the country. The Ministry of Culture and the Ministry of Foreign Trade also issued the "Several Opinions on the Export Appraisal Standards of Cultural Relics" on July 12, 1960, stipulating that there are two different years for the planned and organized export of cultural relics: - partly limited to 1795, and all those before 1795 (limited to the 60th year of Qianlong in the Qing Dynasty) are not allowed to be exported; - Partly limited to 1911 (i.e., before Xinhai, the third year of Xuantong in the Qing Dynasty), and the export shall be prohibited. Cultural relics after the above two years can be exported according to the scientific, historical, artistic value and stock of the cultural relics themselves. All ports are required to be basically similar when mastering the appraisal standards and controlling the width and strict scale.同一年文物局制定《文物出口鉴定标准》,按照不同文物的情况确定1911、1795(乾隆六十年)两条界线。对于那些重复和价值一般的文物可以有组织、有计划地作特许出口,为国家争取外汇。文化部和对外贸易部又于1960年7月12日印发了《文物出口鉴定标准的几点意见》,规定对于有计划组织出口的—般文物,划定两个不同的年限:—部分以1795年为限,凡1795年(限清代乾隆六十年为限)以前的一律不准出口;—部分以1911年为限(即清代宣统三年辛亥以前为限),凡1911年以前的一律禁止出口。在以上两个年限以后的文物,根据文物本身所具有的科学、历史、艺术价值及存量多少来确定是否可以出口。要求各口岸在掌握鉴定标准、控制宽严尺度时,务必大体相近基本相同。