Your source is Zhihu? That's even less trustworthy than your posts.
The government exported some duplicate relics and other artifacts which weren't deemed very high cultural value to earn foreign exchange. This is totally different than artifacts like that buddha, don't muddy the water. Next time please try harder before smearing China here.
I just want to explain the consequences of the serious neglect of cultural relics protection in the past for a long time. Although it was clearly stipulated that only low-value cultural relics were allowed to be exported, Shen Congwen(沈从文) still intercepted a batch of high-grade silk fabrics from the customs.Yeah you memory isn’t that great and have a tendency to generalize. It‘s very specific in which can and can’t be exported.
In the same year, the Cultural Heritage Bureau formulated the Standards for the Appraisal of Cultural Relics Export, which determined two boundaries of 1911 and 1795 (60 years of Qianlong) according to the situation of different cultural relics. Those cultural repetitive and of average value can be exported in an organized and planned way to obtain foreign exchange for the country. The Ministry of Culture and the Ministry of Foreign Trade also issued the "Several Opinions on the Export Appraisal Standards of Cultural Relics" on July 12, 1960, stipulating that there are two different years for the planned and organized export of cultural relics: - partly limited to 1795, and all those before 1795 (limited to the 60th year of Qianlong in the Qing Dynasty) are not allowed to be exported; - Partly limited to 1911 (i.e., before Xinhai, the third year of Xuantong in the Qing Dynasty), and the export shall be prohibited. Cultural relics after the above two years can be exported according to the scientific, historical, artistic value and stock of the cultural relics themselves. All ports are required to be basically similar when mastering the appraisal standards and controlling the width and strict scale.
For a long time, the management of the Palace Museum was not as strict as you thought.For example, the cotton in the armor of the Qing Dynasty was taken out and distributed to the employees, and some fragments that were "considered unimportant" were also distributed to the employees.
That is the most important national museum.You can see how careless people were about the importance of cultural relics in the past.
"have no choice",this article says.Sence the policy is loosened, many things that you can't imagine will happen.
The smuggled buddha statues have nothing to do with these things.But it shows the severity of the loss of cultural relics in the past.Once the government has shown a careless and conniving attitude, then the private crime of cultural relics smuggling is bound to be very rampant.
Last edited: