Violet Oboe
Junior Member
After all the Iranian's must have a Plan B after their overt nuclear sites have been destroyed or at least damaged.
Iran began her incessant effort to acquire nuclear technology and the means to develop and produce a nuclear weapon back in the mid 80's under the guidance of Hashemi Rafsandshani and it is known that Iran got A.Q. Khan's ´info package´back in '87. Accordingly they are in the know about the nuclear game for 20 years now and obviously they are aware of the fact that the most dangerous phase would be AFTER they have produced the first warheads of their initial arsenal.
Only after Iran would have built up a robust arsenal comparable with Pakistan (80-100 warheads, 3 types of mobile ballistic missiles) the necessary effect of deterrence would be assured against Israel and against regional assets of the US . (of course the US could win in a conflict with a nuclear Iran but the whole middle east would go ablaze and 100 million dead people do not pay America's bills)
Meanwhile and until the line of ´minimal deterrent´is crossed Iran's leaders will have to deny, deceive and even if necessary convert to judaism as long as Iran's nascent capability remains secret, ambiguous or at least deniable.
North Korea's strategic situation is completely different since high value targets in her immediate neighborhood can be credibly threatened with only a few crude bombs and additionally NK is a state without much to loose. Interestingly Pyongyang and Tehran have an intimate relationship for 25 years now and NK's miraculous economic survival has probably very much to do with iranian cash and oil. NK has without doubt nuclear weapons, the necessary weapons grade PU and a healthy interest in keeping Iran strong enough to deflect US power from converging on NK, so some decisive deal has occurred probably already years ago (probably after the US invasion of Iraq, Kim Jong Il was reportedly shocked for months...).
Naturally my speculation can be wrong but my assumption is that Iran has already got a nascent initial nuclear capability but this constitutes currently more a danger than a deterrent for Tehran and the iranian strategists know about that very well. Unfortunately this unstable period of time is prone to disastrous miscalculations: Tehran could be prompted to test a weapon demonstratively just before an anticipated US strike and the US or even Israel could respond with a massive tactical nuke strike on an array of iranian military targets. The stakes in this deadly game are very high indeed and for the sake of mankind both adversaries must find a sustainable compromise (...just like the Cold War was at least absence of real war).
Iran began her incessant effort to acquire nuclear technology and the means to develop and produce a nuclear weapon back in the mid 80's under the guidance of Hashemi Rafsandshani and it is known that Iran got A.Q. Khan's ´info package´back in '87. Accordingly they are in the know about the nuclear game for 20 years now and obviously they are aware of the fact that the most dangerous phase would be AFTER they have produced the first warheads of their initial arsenal.
Only after Iran would have built up a robust arsenal comparable with Pakistan (80-100 warheads, 3 types of mobile ballistic missiles) the necessary effect of deterrence would be assured against Israel and against regional assets of the US . (of course the US could win in a conflict with a nuclear Iran but the whole middle east would go ablaze and 100 million dead people do not pay America's bills)
Meanwhile and until the line of ´minimal deterrent´is crossed Iran's leaders will have to deny, deceive and even if necessary convert to judaism as long as Iran's nascent capability remains secret, ambiguous or at least deniable.
North Korea's strategic situation is completely different since high value targets in her immediate neighborhood can be credibly threatened with only a few crude bombs and additionally NK is a state without much to loose. Interestingly Pyongyang and Tehran have an intimate relationship for 25 years now and NK's miraculous economic survival has probably very much to do with iranian cash and oil. NK has without doubt nuclear weapons, the necessary weapons grade PU and a healthy interest in keeping Iran strong enough to deflect US power from converging on NK, so some decisive deal has occurred probably already years ago (probably after the US invasion of Iraq, Kim Jong Il was reportedly shocked for months...).
Naturally my speculation can be wrong but my assumption is that Iran has already got a nascent initial nuclear capability but this constitutes currently more a danger than a deterrent for Tehran and the iranian strategists know about that very well. Unfortunately this unstable period of time is prone to disastrous miscalculations: Tehran could be prompted to test a weapon demonstratively just before an anticipated US strike and the US or even Israel could respond with a massive tactical nuke strike on an array of iranian military targets. The stakes in this deadly game are very high indeed and for the sake of mankind both adversaries must find a sustainable compromise (...just like the Cold War was at least absence of real war).
Last edited: