Yes...I understand the implications.
And if it comes to trading off some of the F-35As for F-35Bs...I too agree that is not likely, and would represent a potentially unacceptable trade-off.
Same is true if considering lessening the potential ASW role and capability of the Canberras.
However, if they were to outfit her for an ASW role...if she operated as the centerpiece of a RAN ASW TF in a future environment where other belligerents had a carrier TF searching for her, a squadron of 6-8 F-35Bs operating off of her deck would represent a very strong compliment to her ASW capabilities without sacrificing that capability at all. And providing a necessary air defense component to protect her from the threat of those belligerents.
I suppose it could be argued that she would operate in that role with US Navy coverage...but being able to provide her own would significantly increase their flexibility and utility for both the RAN and the USN.
Time will tell. Both the RAN and the JMSDF, as I have said, with the vessels they are building, they have created the opportunity create a fixed wing capability off of those vessels at a later date f they determine for themselves that the threat warrants it. I believe that was a part of the calculus as well.
Threat environments can change and increase. Financial environments can improve for the better. They have provided for themselves a platform that can be adapted to those changing conditions if necessary. That is really my main point.
