Yes it is Roberto, Jeff is probably our most knowledgeable shipright….Nice work
if we were so inclined?? we could call Jeff the Navy Brat!
Yes it is Roberto, Jeff is probably our most knowledgeable shipright….Nice work
and here's the news:yeah I'm no expert, but I would've thought the elevators speed hadn't been limiting combat ops!
I'm not in the MIC Conspiracy though I think ridiculously fast elevators which don't work is an example of creating over-engineered and overpriced 'solutions' to make the Pentagon pay even more;
the companies sure have teams of spin-doctors who come up with fancy 'products' like LCS mission modules concept, so called stealthy 16k-displacing Zumwalts and other game-changers, for example recently the USN asked for like 3b for unmanned 'fleet' without having ConOps! I don't believe it's Admirals creating this type of nonsense, I think it's marketing departments and their consultants in action, selling EDITED
Wednesday at 3:15 PM
Later this month, USS Gerald Ford (CVN-78) will depart Huntington Ingalls Industries Newport News Shipbuilding, cross the James River and report pier-side to Naval Station Norfolk, Va. The carrier will then begin preparation for an anticipated deployment in 2021.
While the carrier will work through the remaining tasks to certify aircraft for the new launching and recovery systems, test radars and other systems, the service will still be exorcising the gremlins from the Advanced Weapons Elevators aboard Ford. The carrier will be short nine certified weapons elevators as the service works to integrate the new technology into its next generation of aircraft carriers.
The AWEs are based on the same technology that powers high-speed magnetic levitation trains. The system eschews cables found aboard most standard elevators for high-powered permanent magnets that are computer-controlled. The Navy believes the underlying concept is sound, the problems now being corrected are rooted in integrating the elevators aboard the carrier.
“Due to the concurrent nature of development and construction, the shipboard AWEs have been test beds for identifying many of the remaining developmental and production issues for this first-in-class system, including issues with producing the tight tolerances required for the impacted doors and hatches,” Navy spokesman Capt. Danny Hernandez told USNI News in a statement.
“These issues have required physical adjustments and software refinement to make AWE operations sustainable and reliable.”
Correcting and debugging the AWEs have become a time-consuming problem for the service as it hustles to prepare Fordfor sea.
Earlier this year, USNI News reported the year-long post-shakedown availability (PSA) for Ford was extended by three months to correct the issues with the elevators and problems with the ship’s nuclear propulsion.
“All three of those causal factors – making the adjustments to the nuclear power plant that we noted during sea trials, fitting in all of the post-shakedown availability workload and finishing up the elevators – they’re all trending about the same time,” James Geurts, assistant secretary of the Navy for research, development and acquisition .
Geurts said at the time that there would still be some elevators not operational when Ford returned to Norfolk.
The elevators are one of several new technologies that were inserted in the first-in-class carrier that were included in the design that would reduce the crew size while increasing the amount of aircraft that could be launched and recovered.
However, continued delays in delivery and a cost increase to $13 billion have made Ford a popular target for criticism in Congress.
“The Navy entered into this contract in 2008, which, combined with other contracts, ballooned the cost of the ship to more than $13 billion without understanding the technical risk, the cost or the schedules, Senate Armed Services Committee chair Sen. Jim Inhofe (R-Okla.) .
“This ought to be criminal.”
Earlier this year, Secretary of the Navy Richard V. Spencer told an audience at the Center for New American Security that he had made a handshake agreement with President Trump on the sidelines of the Army-Navy football game.
“I shook his hand and said, the elevators will be ready to go when she pulls out or you can fire me,” Spencer said in January.
In a statement to USNI News, a Spencer spokesperson said he, “remains fully committed to USS Gerald R. Ford, to her crew, and to the technology employed aboard the ship. He looks forward to seeing Ford underway later this month. The Navy and ship’s crew have diligently tackled issues and will continue to do so. All are eager to demonstrate Ford’s capacity to deliver combat power. There is more work to do, but the crew and ship are ready to go to sea, and the Secretary is proud of their efforts.”
In May, the Navy announced it was building a land based test site for the AWEs that would be completed in 2020.
“The Navy and shipbuilder are also completing a full digital twin co-located at the shipyard facility in Newport News that will be complete in Fall of 2019. Both systems will allow the Navy and shipbuilder to mature the technology and aide in troubleshooting,” .
John F. Kennedy (CVN-79) and Enterprise (CVN-80), it won’t come online in time to help correct issues on Ford.