Aircraft Carriers III

quite interesting part of
2019 NDAA Amendments Question Carrier Long-Range Strike, Future of ASW Helos
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

:

“The committee notes that the aircraft carrier air wing has been optimized for striking power and sortie generation and believes that it may not be configured to support the long-range strike required by current and future threat systems. While the introduction of the F-35C will significantly expand stealth capabilities, the F-35C could require increased range to address necessary targets. The committee believes that several options could be used to address this issue to include developing a stealth tanker capability, improved engine technology or to develop and procure a strike capability that is purposely built to strike at increased range. The committee further notes that the Navy previously desired to significantly increase the carrier air wing range with the development of the A-12 aircraft. The committee understands that the A-12 would have included a 5,000-pound internal carriage payload, stealth, and a range of 800 nautical miles. While the committee believes that requirements to support this capability remain relevant and the technology available, the development of the A-12 aircraft was mired in acquisition challenges that eventually resulted in the cancellation of the program. While the committee further believes that the Department of Defense has successfully developed a suite of long-range intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance capabilities, the committee also believes that it is vital that the Navy develop a carrier-based long-range strike capability. Therefore, the committee directs the Secretary of the Navy to provide a briefing to the Senate Committee on Armed Services and the House Committee on Armed Services by January 25, 2019, on options to expand the strike range of a carrier air wing in a contested environment, including manned and unmanned capabilities, and, Department of the Navy capabilities it plans to pursue in the Next Generation Air Dominance capability,” according to the amendment.
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
The committee further notes that the Navy previously desired to significantly increase the carrier air wing range with the development of the A-12 aircraft. The committee understands that the A-12 would have included a 5,000-pound internal carriage payload, stealth, and a range of 800 nautical miles. While the committee believes that requirements to support this capability remain relevant and the technology available, the development of the A-12 aircraft was mired in acquisition challenges that eventually resulted in the cancellation of the program.
Wait? A12? You mean this A 12?
A-12_Avenger_Concept.jpg
I mean the A12 Avenger 2 was canceled in 91? That's a Old reference.
 

bd popeye

The Last Jedi
VIP Professional
We Need this first! Just FF to 0.42 seconds....I love this scene in Casablanca with La Marseillaise sung by the Free French.


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


ATLANTIC OCEAN (May 10, 2018) Rafale's attached to squadron 17F of the Marine Nationale (French Navy) prepares to land on the flight deck of the aircraft carrier USS George H.W. Bush (CVN 77). The Ship is underway in the Atlantic Ocean conducting carrier air wing exercises with the French navy to strengthen partnerships and deepen interoperability between the two nations' naval forces. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class Zachary P. Wickline)

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


ATLANTIC OCEAN (May 10, 2018) Rafale attached to squadron 17F of the Marine Nationale (French Navy) prepares to launch off the flight deck of the aircraft carrier USS George H.W. Bush (CVN 77). (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class David Mora Jr.)

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


ATLANTIC OCEAN (May 10, 2018) A Rafale attached to squadron 17F of the Marine Nationale (French Navy) lands on the flight deck of the aircraft carrier USS George H.W. Bush (CVN 77). (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class David Mora Jr.)


For HI-RES go here >>>
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


You must be a member of DVIDS to see HI-RES pix! DVIDS is 100% free to be a member!
 
Apr 21, 2018
Yesterday at 8:03 AM
now USS Truman Strike Group Begins Mediterranean Operations
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!





Just like old times:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
warships are tailing US
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
HARRY S
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
CVN75 operating in the eastern Mediterranean. Exchanges are "professional," sez the US admiral.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


DdDivSJVQAAWzCs.jpg

DdDivzXV0AEN9QD.jpg
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Though we have threads in the Chinese military forum for this, where it has already been posted..I thought it should be noted here too that at last, CV-17 is off to sea for the PLAN:

001a-to-sea-01.jpg
 
Last edited:
oops, U.S. Navy’s Costliest Vessel Just Got Even Pricier
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

  • Service tells Congress it’s breached lid by $120 million
  • Spending required to fix propulsion parts, weapons elevators

The Navy’s costliest vessel ever just got pricer, breaching a $12.9 billion cap set by Congress by $120 million, the service told lawmakers this week.

The extra money for the U.S.S. Gerald R. Ford built by
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
is needed to replace faulty propulsion components damaged in a January failure, extend the vessel’s post-delivery repair phase to 12 months from the original eight months and correct deficiencies with the “Advanced Weapons Elevators” used to move munitions from deep in the ship to the deck.

The elevators on the ship, designated CVN 78, need to be fixed “to preclude any effect on the safety of the ship and personnel,” the Naval Sea Systems Command said in a statement to Bloomberg News on Friday. “Once the adjustment is executed, the cost for CVN 78 will stand at $13.027” billion, the Navy said.

In addition to informing Congress that the spending lid has been breached, the Navy will have to let lawmakers know how it will shift funds to make up the difference.

Navy officials didn’t disclose the propulsion failure or elevator problems during budget hearings before Congress in recent weeks, and House and Senate lawmakers didn’t ask about it. The Navy is seeking approval in the fiscal 2019 defense request to accelerate purchase of the fourth carrier in the new Ford class by bundling it into a contract with the third. It expects to request congressional support over the next few months for what’s now an estimated $58 billion program.

The Ford’s propulsion system and elevator flaws are separate from reliability issues on its troubled aircraft launch and recovery systems.

After its delivery last May, the ship operated for 70 days and completed 747 shipboard aircraft launches and recoveries, exceeding the goal of about 400, the Navy said.

None of the 11 weapons elevators are operational but at least two are being used for testing “to identify many of the remaining developmental issues for this first-of-class system,” the Navy has said. The command said all 11 elevators “should have been complete and delivered with the ship delivery” in May 2017.
 
Top