Miragedriver
Brigadier
Re: PLAN Carrier Operations..News, Videos & Photos II
Obi wan,
I have a naive question.
Is a catapult launch best if you want to launch large fully loaded aircraft. However, because the aircraft types take off and land at a much higher rate of speed, you need a much larger/longer flight deck, which means larger ship.
A Ramp system seam better for a small carrier that can service a very limited number of aircraft. Doesn’t this also seriously limit the amount of ordinance they can carry?
The expensive part of a catapult is not in how long the stoke is, it's all the below decks equipment. a 100ft cat will require almost as many crew and take up almost as many compartments below decks as a 300ft cat. Hooking up an aircraft to a cat and making all the checks takes time and needs a number of deck crew. By contrast ramp launch needs less deck crew, takes less time as the aircraft only needs to be spotted on the runway. In early trials back in 1981, on an excercise in the North Atlantic, HMS Invincible launched a flight of four Sea Harriers in 50 seconds. Also on the excercise was USS Nimitz, who after recieving the same alert took two minutes to launch her first Tomcat. Her catapults could then launch one F-14 every 30 seconds, but they were playing catch up with the Shars by this time. The difference in numbers of crew required to operate the catapults (and to a lesser extent the arrestor gear) was a key factor in the switch back from catobar to stovl for the Queen Elizabeth class.
Obi wan,
I have a naive question.
Is a catapult launch best if you want to launch large fully loaded aircraft. However, because the aircraft types take off and land at a much higher rate of speed, you need a much larger/longer flight deck, which means larger ship.
A Ramp system seam better for a small carrier that can service a very limited number of aircraft. Doesn’t this also seriously limit the amount of ordinance they can carry?