2026 Iran War Strategy and Analysis

Ringsword

Senior Member
Registered Member
Only the seats and parts of the fuselage are armored against shrapnel and 7.62 rounds, the windshields aren't though offer some sort of anti spall protection
Yes,quite plausible-as many stories of Afghan Mujihadeen fighters armed with old style 7.7mm/.303 Lee -Enfield rifles have killed Soviet Hind helicopter pilots by shooting through the windshield as the deadly Hind is armoured on the bottom/titanium armoured cockpit meant to shield from groundfire-like the A10 warthog but many mujihadeen were shooting at them from the higher elevation of mountains-apocryphal stories maybe take it with a grain of salt but still good to hear
 

NorthKimBestKim

New Member
Registered Member
Since the sick Orange Mussolini psycho is threatening again today "ending the civilization" in Iran tonight, there has never been a greater chance of nuclear weapons being used over the past 40 years than it is now.

PRC should seriously offer a few transport aircraft to DPRK Special Forces. DPRK can put DPRK flags on the aircraft, so that DPRK could go airborne through PRC and Afghanistan into Iran with a couple of nukes on board. There is no other way now.

DPRK and Russia are battling NATO supported cucks in Leftovers-Ukraine, so opening another front for the DPRK is possible, but it has to be airborne and the closest way to reach Iran is through PRC and Afghanistan.
 

protonme18

Junior Member
Registered Member
Don't think nuke will be used, else Russia already used it on Kiev long ago. US using it now will open a pandora box, this give more the reason Russia to use one on Ukraine. Similar, IRGC with their extreme anger could fix a dirty nuke and fired it on Tel Aviv. Who to say, Russia might supply them one, even China or North Korea...I don't think Israel will be standing after that. What can ensure one won't go off in Washington DC itself by really an extreme radicalized Iranian\group out for revenge. Who can even ensure the safety of Trump's family after that.....revenge can happen even years later
 

Serb

Senior Member
Registered Member
I do not understand why anyone still takes Trump’s baby tantrums seriously, as if he has not already extended that same “deadline” six different times.

What exactly is he going to do that he is not already doing?

They are already bombing power plants, bridges, railways, gas fields, and whatever else they can hit without actually toppling the regime. Have people gone senile?

The most Trump can really do at this point is speed up the burning of what is left of the empire’s Tomahawks, JASSMs, and other expensive, long-range toys on civilian targets that still do not achieve any political objective.

And once they waste the last meaningful chunk of those stockpiles, then what?

At that point, there is not much the US can actually do. Iran could end up marching across the region, taking the oilfields, and trading them for Chinese infrastructure and reconstruction support.
 

protonme18

Junior Member
Registered Member
As said, military has it's military end goal. Just who currently is setting the tempo, it's better you set the tempo and the opponents react, then waiting or watching all those Trump's tweet nonsense. First, war goal of Hezbollahs in South Lebanon is beat back IDF and establish a no go zone deeper into Israel. This can be done via drones, anti-tank, rockets and mortars firing. Use guerilla tactic where you control the country side. I read they now even has anti-ship weapons. Ukraine vs Russia war shows how a weaker force, with right strategy, weapons and intel can beat back a bigger force. Yemen Houthis can continue harassing from the south. Not by random firing/launching drones or ballistic missiles, but with some coordination and key military high value target, like power plant, radars, HQ, control tower, key bridges, industrial zones. For IRGC, should moves beyond reciprocal targets, but similar power plants, treatment plants, chemical/refinery plants, business zones, key ports plants so on.....set the tempo, then reacting to Trump's tweet here and there. See your military goals until the opponents cries uncle and offer you a better term. Any ceasefire or whatever deal, just kicking the can down the road and letting they restock. As you can see, when the third carrier came, Trump's tweet become more louder and threatening.....before the arrivals, they busy with false diplomacy of ceasefire nonsense this or that......ignore these talks, the commanders on the field just proceed with war goals regardless, when the opponents low on interceptors, fire 50% more on that particular to ensure better and more hits, when their stock came, change to more attritional with extra more drones sending.....set the battle tempo, then waiting whatever plans from Pentagon with IDF came to fruitions, let them react as opposed to you being reacting
 

NorthKimBestKim

New Member
Registered Member
Don't think nuke will be used, else Russia already used it on Kiev long ago. US using it now will open a pandora box, this give more the reason Russia to use one on Ukraine. Similar, IRGC with their extreme anger could fix a dirty nuke and fired it on Tel Aviv. Who to say, Russia might supply them one, even China or North Korea...I don't think Israel will be standing after that. What can ensure one won't go off in Washington DC itself by really an extreme radicalized Iranian\group out for revenge. Who can even ensure the safety of Trump's family after that.....revenge can happen even years later
I mean the problem is that danger has never been higher than it is now. Doesn't mean necessary that Trump will use it, but he has crossed many lines lately. People are being massacred in Lebanon and Palestine, being bombed in Iraq and Iran, whilst president of Venezuela being kidnapped and Venezuela's oil being stolen.

That is sick as it gets. Trump also talks about how he will make Cuba his own property. Probably a new Epstein Island in the future.

One needs to understand the sick mind of the Empire.

Picture this. Trump's goal is to make Iran suffer and surrender totally to the U.S. demands, right?

Let me point out which country submitted to the U.S. after the U.S. nuked them twice? Yup, Japan. The "nuking" was so "great" that it made even Japanese love to submit to the U.S. Empire.

The sick mind of the Orange and the rest of the Empire is still the same as it was in 1945, which is: if we nuke another country - or bomb them to stone age - as Hegseth said, that particular country will submit and worship the U.S. Empire, just as Japan did after 1945.

That is how they think.
 

protonme18

Junior Member
Registered Member
Let me point out which country submitted to the U.S. after the U.S. nuked them twice? Yup, Japan. The "nuking" was so "great" that it made even Japanese love to submit to the U.S. Empire.

The sick mind of the Orange and the rest of the Empire is still the same as it was in 1945, which is: if we nuke another country - or bomb them to stone age - as Hegseth said, that particular country will submit and worship the U.S. Empire, just as Japan did after 1945.

That is how they think.
At that time, atomic bomb is sort of a novelty weapon and Japan happens to be at the right time to be used as lab rat live testing (perhaps some racism there chosen as a choice). You have to picture the condition then, WW2 is a total war. Means, bombing cities, civilians, total annihilation of your opponent are common and violation rampants, Nanjing Massacre, MyLai Massacre, Agent Orange, Burma Death Railway, Holocaust, Unit 701 etc atrocious events and no rights whatsoever....and that total war been going on for 4 or 5 years. The current timeline, nuke is not a novelty weapon now, there are about 9 or so countries having nuke from lowest grade to highest. There are "rules or norms" established and UN as guide (even if some country/ies reverting to law of the jungle) but generally majority country still behaves in a well mannered decorum follow these "norms/guidelines" except for a few we don't say.....not easy to use nuke and it's not a monopoly of a single country like WW2 back then. Don't worry about it, as crazy or nutcase Trump make himself seems to be....he loves Baron too....and Melania.....there won't be nuke used. He can huff he can puff all he wants, he can't blow the house down...
 

iewgnem

Captain
Registered Member
I mean the problem is that danger has never been higher than it is now. Doesn't mean necessary that Trump will use it, but he has crossed many lines lately. People are being massacred in Lebanon and Palestine, being bombed in Iraq and Iran, whilst president of Venezuela being kidnapped and Venezuela's oil being stolen.

That is sick as it gets. Trump also talks about how he will make Cuba his own property. Probably a new Epstein Island in the future.

One needs to understand the sick mind of the Empire.

Picture this. Trump's goal is to make Iran suffer and surrender totally to the U.S. demands, right?

Let me point out which country submitted to the U.S. after the U.S. nuked them twice? Yup, Japan. The "nuking" was so "great" that it made even Japanese love to submit to the U.S. Empire.

The sick mind of the Orange and the rest of the Empire is still the same as it was in 1945, which is: if we nuke another country - or bomb them to stone age - as Hegseth said, that particular country will submit and worship the U.S. Empire, just as Japan did after 1945.

That is how they think.
I do find it ironic they started the war trying to starve Cuba of fuel and now they're sitting on Iran starving the entire west of fuel.
 

tokenanalyst

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
1775579721184.png
If he means by using conventional weapons, that ain't happening chief Iran is just too big for that, the country is massive, the US and Israel will deplete their entire arsenal and achieve nothing. If he means using tactical nukes then he is opening a whole new can worms.
 
Top