I have heard that 5 Carriers could be in the AOR, which includes the two British CVs, but I saw from the position that one may be in the North Atlantic and the other in Asia.Does it matter? What they currently have in Centcom is already overkill…
I have heard that 5 Carriers could be in the AOR, which includes the two British CVs, but I saw from the position that one may be in the North Atlantic and the other in Asia.Does it matter? What they currently have in Centcom is already overkill…
Opposing occupation doesn't mean you are a terrorist. By your reasoning, "it is horrible IJA killed a few million Chinese civilians, but it was okay because they were hunting CCP terrorists."supporting the government doesn’t mean your not a civilian
It's from a Pakistani source, until there's more evidence I'd take it with a grain of salt. I definitely wouldn't be surprised if it turns out to be true though.Curious what lran reaction abt this, they hav given rights of the Chambahar Port to lndia, seem by some media as "counterbalancing" gwadar/cpec? lndia and lran also have the central asia route thing.. Will it be affected?
What is the position of the British aircraft carrier HMS Queen Elizabeth?
Continuing from this.TACO in full effect.
Trump knows he will pay politically if he attacks which has the potential to drag US into another ME war. "Not starting wars" is something he is proud of.
At the same time, Bibi has dragged him into this mess. But Trump really doesn't want to do this.
2 weeks tells me a couple things.
This move by Trump will win him so much political points at home and cost Bibi points at his home. Brilliant move by Trump if I may say.
- Time for US carriers and more assets to get into the region.
- Time for Israel to continue to degrade Iran.
- More time to negotiate with Iran and potentially strike a deal.
Iran should give up their program and focus on improving themselves conventionally. They can't win this foolish war. They should look to what Pakistan has done and go fully into C******* (the country we can't speak off) and Russian military upgrades for the next 4-5 years. Iran has the money to even acquire the J-35s.
Continuing to fight this war is stupid.
Israel won't be able to strike them if they give up the nuclear program. And even more Israel won't be able to do jack sh*t while Iran upgrades its air force with Su-35s and J-35s and other Russian and C****** (the country we can't speak off) AD systems.
The solution to all this is very clear.
You do need proof and just because isreal kills civilians doesn’t make it morally right and ok for Iran to kill civilians too.1. 2025 Israel - Iranian conflict
Gonna ask @sheogorath to elaborate
2. Don't need proof. If they hid a command center under a civilian center before you can morally assume that all of their civilian centers are open game and that's how they operate.
3. Don't need proof. They do it to you so you can do it to them.
For the reasons outlined above, it is absolutely moral and right, to any country that acts as Israel but especially even more to Israel because their own people from the President down to the street sweeper proclaim, "No one is innocent." It's their own words. They're not innocent and they deserve everything dealt to them; they're all guilty from the horse's mouth. Why are you trying to say that they are innocent civilians when they all declare themselves to be guilty?
Oh ok. I guess if you say, "never" enough times, it becomes true LOL. Hey, I have a question: is there peace today between Native Americans and the current American government? How was it achieved? Through peaceful negotiating or through killing so many Native Americans that they just gave up? Live history to prove you wrong even though logic should have done it easily.
The UK CSG that was heading to Asia and was training with Indian navy in the Arabian Sea did a 180 and sailed through the Suez Canal heading back into the Med. They were rushing so much that they even left their stranded F-35 in India.
What is the position of the British aircraft carrier HMS Queen Elizabeth?
Looping back. Reread the points above.You do need proof and just because isreal kills civilians doesn’t make it morally right and ok for Iran to kill civilians too.
1. There is no international law or Israel would never have been allowed to exist, expand, or attack other countries.they can say whatever they want to in the eyes of international law their still civilians and still innocent it’s never morally right to kill civilians if you don’t need too even then it’s extremely questionable and not always morally right.
"Not liking" is peace. There is no violence. You don't have to like someone to be at peace with them. Iran doesn't have to convince Israelis to like them; they just have to convince them to never attack them again by delivering the most devastating beating of Israel's history or just beating it out of existence, which is best. It works. All of human history shows that it works.No there isn’t peace between native Americans and the US government, they may not be fighting each other but the majority of natives don’t like the US government one bit.
None of what you said is true one bit. You are extremely anti semitic. I understand you hate Jews and don’t want them to exist and them to be wiped out because of their government but you are aware you are calling for genocide of them what makes you an horrible person.Looping back. Reread the points above.
1. Don't need proof. If they hid a command center under a civilian center before you can morally assume that all of their civilian centers are open game and that's how they operate.
2. Don't need proof. They do it to you so you can do it to them. Israel is the one going around poking everyone in the eye. Iran is the only one who poked back. And now, instead of blaming Israel for starting it and praising Iran for finally giving Israel a taste of its own medicine, you blame Iran, saying it shouldn't poke Israel in the eye even though Israel did it to Iran because 2 wrongs don't make a right. That's how insane and warped you are.
3. There are no civilians in Israel. They told everyone that no one is innocent. They said they're all guilty. You can't speak for their innocence.
1. There is no international law or Israel would never have been allowed to exist, expand, or attack other countries.
2. If they say you're guilty, and you say they're innocent, well, you've got egg on your face, haven't you?
"Not liking" is peace. There is no violence. You don't have to like someone to be at peace with them. Iran doesn't have to convince Israelis to like them; they just have to convince them to never attack them again by delivering the most devastating beating of Israel's history or just beating it out of existence, which is best. It works. All of human history shows that it works.
well given that Israel bombed Iran while Iran was in talks with an untrusted party that is actively plotting to kill them, it kinda makes sense that Iran has finally gotten fed up and simply considers all of Israel as the enemy, civilian or not. In the time of war that Israel has started, it no longer matters who is a civilian or not given Israel’s lack of respect for such norms. If Iran has no choice but to fight back no matter the cost, then I guess Iran simply has no choice but to fight on as hard as possible as no alternative is given as of now that doesn’t involve humiliation on their part. Israel started this fight and Iran has no choice to end it by any means necessary. If one compares the support America has gotten from the whole Afghan war and the support it has now, it’s quite telling that most of the world simply doesn’t have much in way of sympathy for both Israel and the USA as of now. I hope Trump has it in him to stop his madness because if he doesn’t, his presidency will end up having a horrible legacy to put it mildlyLooping back. Reread the points above.
1. Don't need proof. If they hid a command center under a civilian center before you can morally assume that all of their civilian centers are open game and that's how they operate.
2. Don't need proof. They do it to you so you can do it to them.
3. There are no civilians in Israel. They told everyone that no one is innocent. They said they're all guilty. You can't speak for their innocence.
1. There is no international law or Israel would never have been allowed to exist, expand, or attack other countries.
2. If they say you're guilty, and you say they're innocent, well, you've got egg on your face, haven't you?
"Not liking" is peace. There is no violence. You don't have to like someone to be at peace with them. Iran doesn't have to convince Israelis to like them; they just have to convince them to never attack them again by delivering the most devastating beating of Israel's history or just beating it out of existence, which is best.
It is quite easy for most people to side with Gaza and Iran in regards to Israels extremely poor conduct these days (I mean open genocide is happening right now no matter what you try to say to cover this truth up), whether one loves Jews or not, Netanyahu actions hasn’t really helped the nations reputation one bit during his tenure as president. Also the word antisemitism has been used so often as a defence for Israel’s action that over time, it simply has lost the sort of impact it once would’ve had. If he is considered horrible for being disgusted at Israel’s conduct, then I must admit your blind support of Israel despite their actions should be equally deplorable. There is a reason why the world as a general whole is turning against Israel and no I don’t mean the western leaders who I am convinced are androids who have long since a lost the ability to feel years ago. Even on twitter where most of the Iran strikes are being reported, all I seem to see is that the majority of the responders don’t seem to have much sympathy for Israel’s plight to put it mildlyNone of what you said is true one bit. You are extremely anti semitic. I understand you hate Jews and don’t want them to exist and them to be wiped out because of their government but you are aware you are calling for genocide of them what makes you an horrible person.